Jump to content

Tournaments divided into Sections


Recommended Posts

I have run fairly small tournaments for a while but this is something new to me -

 

I have had two recent tourneys - one with 16 the other with 17 tables - divide into 2 sections of about 8 tables each.

 

This has not happened to me before (and I am sure that I have had tournaments with more tables). And I dont want this to happen now.

 

These tournaments are IMP Pairs (not swiss) clocked to 14 minutes per round of 2 hands.

 

Is this something new? Am I setting up the tourney wrong? How can I stop this division - or, at least, postpone it until I have at least 40 or more tables?

 

jandrew

 

PS I do not want this tourney to be an Indy, nor MP%, nor swiss, nor unclocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Uday for such a prompt and authorative answer.

 

A small group of us run Ts for the Acol Players' Club. There is a Swiss IMPs Pairs on Thursday, an MP% Indy on Friday and an IMPs Pairs on Sunday with a Mitchell movement (this is the one which divided into sections).

 

The first reason that I care is that each of the Ts is part of a 3-month league. Each player scores according to his place in the T (the T winner taking most points). The point are accumulated over the 13 weeks of the 3-month period. (The details, if you want to look, are at www.acolatbbo.org.uk )

 

With the Indy, there is usually only one clear winner - that is fine.

With the Swiss Pairs, there are two clear winners (each member of the pair) - that is fine.

With the Mitchell Pairs, there are 4 winners (each member of the NS and EW winning pairs) - that is fine.

 

But when the Mitchell Pairs splits into sections the number of winners doubles (NS & EW in both sections). That is too many and I have to reconstruct a single list (based in IMPs) to score from - this seems to be an unneccessary waste of time.

 

The second reason that I care is that we urge on slow players by announcing the time left in each round (and, where necessary, adjusting unfinished hands). That is much more difficult when there are two sections which are out of sync.

 

But I dont expect you to change the splitting arrangement just to suit me. I shall experiment to see what T parameters do not result in a division at such a low number of tables.

 

Does the split happen at a different number of tables, for example -

In Swiss / Indy / Mitchell movements;

or Clocked / Unclocked.

 

Is there anywhere that I can find this information?

 

Many thanks

jandrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...