Jump to content

Six decisions from ADELAIDE!


WesleyC

Recommended Posts

Here are a few recent hands - IMP scoring.

 

1. UNFAV

 

(P) P (1NT*) 3D

(P) ???

 

*12-14, your system over NT is x=Pen, All the 2 bids show majors to some extent so 3D is P's cheapest natural diamond bid

 

532 A986 6 A9875

 

2. BOTH

 

P (P) 1C (x)

3C (4H) 5C (5H)

???

 

J6 --- JT9542 KT983

 

3. NIL

 

(1H) 1S (2D*) ???

 

* Natural, Non-forcing

 

J3 KJ6 JT KQT984

 

4. BOTH

 

P (3D) ???

 

AT987532 AT5 --- J9

 

5. BOTH

 

(3S) P (P) ???

 

T2 QT AKT9 AKJ53

 

6. NIL

 

(P) 1D (1H) P

(2H) P (P) x

(P) ???

 

K542 T AQT974 Q7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. I don't know what modd. capp. is but if partner is showing 4+ hearts or 5+ spades I want to be in game. If pd only has diamonds, Pass, unless the jump shows an extremely great hand.

 

2. 6

 

3. X

 

4. 4

 

5. X and probably pass 4.

 

6. Pass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Well since you didn't just tell us what 3D means and since there was no X I will assume natural and pass

 

2) Need my guessing shoes since partner could have bid 5 hoping to jack up the opponents and not sure we aren't 3 off at 6 so I will pass.

 

3) pass ...chances for game look too bad at the moment.

 

4) 3 if partner has LR values I will get to game

 

5) X and pass 4

 

6) clearly partner had a penalty pass of 1 but do I have enough defense well tossup between pass and 3 I will pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Abstain. No idea what this system is.

2) Abstain. 3 is very silly with 6-5. It's 4 or 5 the first time. Bidding 3 and then act in front of partner should be a crime.

3) 3. Not forcing of course or we would need a system talk.

4) 4. I can see the point of bidding just three.

5) 3NT. Who cares about stoppers.

6) Pass wtp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. No idea what 'modified capp' is, but assuming 3D shows a weak hand with long diamonds what on earth would I do except pass?

 

2. Abstain. Would never have bid 3C.

 

3. Double, take-out

 

4. 4S, but I don't mind 3S either.

 

5. Double and pass 4H

 

6. Pass. This isn't a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Unless I have some obscure agreement, Pass is wtp?. (If partner claims "We play constructive on destructive bids, you need a talk.)

 

2) Pass. Mostly because I don't wanna give them a free forcing pass.

 

3) X. I'm probably overbidding again.

 

4) 4. Does not set up a force.

 

5) Tough. Anything can look silly. I see no evil, and bid 3NT.

 

6) Pass wtp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Pass

2) 6 - would have bid 5 the first time though and then passed.

3) 3 if nonforcing otherwise X then 3 if that's non-forcing

4) 4 - would prefer to bid only 3 as this isn't quite strong enough for 4 but partner is likely to bid something that's not a spade raise and I will have to rebid spades anyway

5) 3NT. Could be silly yes, but bidding this way has worked out more often than not.

6) Partner's made a penalty double. Obv pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Pass. If partner had a great hand and nearly solid diamonds, he would use penaly dbl

2. Pass. The earlier 3 was a feeble effort

3. 3 Hopefully non forcing

4. 4 8-card suits are rare and deserve being respected

5. Dbl

6. Pass happily

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Assume 6xD solid would try penalty. 3D has 1-3 trump losers. Quit.

2. Was 5C to make or with no 4th trick against 4H? Any doubt let opponents have

5-level. My agreements 5C has no 4xDT so 6C.

3. Meta-agree new suit has at least tolerance for partner's overcall. Why in an auction

that screams misfit? Show clubs

4. Call my 8-suit trumps. 4S hoping partner has 4 working cards of 5:SK, HKQ,

CAH/AQ/KQ if he ups

5. 4C if it denies H-interest (as no T/O X)

6. No negX, no raise, no C-bid, no NT earlier from partner. Hope he heard my

minimum pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 is very tough would bid 3NT at MPs, but at IMPs it is so risky, I am bidding a dreadful 4.

So you will go for +600 at MPs and +130 at IMPs?

Where is the logic?

 

Pass seems obvious, 3N as a distant 2nd choise.

I am pretty sure that anything but Pass on average will pruduce negative score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 is very tough  would bid 3NT at MPs, but at IMPs it is so risky, I am bidding a dreadful 4.

So you will go for +600 at MPs and +130 at IMPs?

Where is the logic?

 

Pass seems obvious, 3N as a distant 2nd choise.

I am pretty sure that anything but Pass on average will pruduce negative score.

Logic being I don't mind -700 or -1100 at MPs as much as I do at IMPs, and that +130 is not what I am hoping for, I await partner to bid 4 or 5 if it is right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Logic being I don't mind -700 or -1100 at MPs as much as I do at IMPs, and that +130 is not what I am hoping for, I await partner to bid 4 or 5 if it is right.

I doun't get...

You bid 3N at Mps not expecting to get a good score on average?

 

How can partner know if it is right to bid over 4?

xx QT doesn't give much enthusiasm (at least for me) to dream about 4 or 5, especially knowing that parter normally has at least 2, and trumps most probably split badly.

3-1 and 4-1 gives 5 IMp difference, IMO fortunate outcome for this bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like 3NT on 5, has to be the most likely game. If there are 3 opposite there is a stop nearly all the time, when there are 2 sometimes partner has the A orK and if partner pulls to 4!h I feel fine about it. I certainly don't expect to be double in it very often and would run anyway.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are a few recent hands - IMP scoring.

1. UNFAV 532 A986 6 A9875

(P) P (1NT*) 3D

(P) ???

*12-14, your system over NT is x=Pen, All the 2 bids show majors to some extent so 3D is P's cheapest natural diamond bid

2. BOTH J6 --- JT9542 KT983

P (P) 1C (x)

3C (4H) 5C (5H)

???

3.  NIL J3 KJ6 JT KQT984

(1H) 1S (2D*) ???

* Natural, Non-forcing

4. BOTH AT987532 AT5 --- J9

P (3D) ???

5. BOTH T2 QT AKT9 AKJ53

(3S) P (P) ???

6. NIL K542 T AQT974 Q7

(P) 1D (1H) P

(2H) P  (P) x

(P) ???

IMO

  1. _P = 10, 3N = 6.
  2. _P = 10, 6 = 5. But I would have bid 5C immediately :}
  3. _2 = 10, 2 = 9, _P = 8, 3 = 7.
  4. _4 = 10, _P = 8, 3 = 6.
  5. _X = 10, 3N = 6, 4 = 5, 4 = 4, _P = 3.
  6. _P = 10, 2 = 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies for posting a fairly boring set of problems. They came up playing with a new partner and we've got a few stylistic differences.

 

1. This was an eye-opener for me. I've always thought it was standard for jumps to the 3 level over a Weak NT to show a good hand. Even more so when unfavourable opposite a passed partner. Turns out partner was on the same wavelength as the rest of you. We got to 3NT a couple off.

 

2. One thing i didn't include in the context of this problem is that you're playing a Weak NT system. A lot of you didn't like the 3C bid - i'm not sure I do either but I'm not thrilled about the alternatives. On the actual deal 6C was a lucky make (opposite AQx xx Kx AQxxxx). 5H was also making. My usual partner and I play that double by a pre-empter (after being raised) suggests a wish to compete further which would've been perfect on this deal.

 

3. I was interested in finding out whether its standard to play 3C as forcing or non-forcing. I would double on this hand, preferring another sharp card for a (forcing) 3C bid. On the actual hand partner bid 3C (assuming it was NF). Everything sat terribly for us and we were headed for a very bad board until the 2D bidder (holding a 3370 5 count) bailed us out by competing in hearts.

 

4. My usual agreement is that 4S here shows a powerful single suiter, so this hand didn't qualify. Responses to this post have confirmed that most of you bid 4S just 'to play'. I bid 3S and the auction continued (5D) p (p) ???. I guessed to pass but it would've be nice to have been able to bid 4S the first time. There were 11 tricks in diamonds and 9 or 10 in Spades.

 

5. Opposite AQ KJxxx xxxx xx 5NT 5H 6D 4C are making. We got to 5 clubs.

 

6. I was venting a little with this post - 2H was making, our way. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...