Jump to content

3 hands @ Teams


fachiru

Recommended Posts

Problem #1

[hv=d=n&v=n&s=sakj109hxxxdxcj9xx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

It goes: 3-(3)-?

 

Problem #2

[hv=d=n&v=n&s=sakj109hxxxdxcj9xx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

You open in 4th 1 and with opps. silent, it goes:

1-2nt*-?

* 2nt was a max passed hand

Should 3 be forcing; Is 4 GF?

 

Problem #3

[hv=d=n&v=n&s=sakj109hxxxdxcj9xx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

It goes: (1)-?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hand 1:

 

We have a fit in clubs

They have a fit (and it sure isn't in Spades)

5 seems pretty clear

 

Hand 2: (I am presuming that 2NT shows a spade fit)

 

I'd bid 3, natural and forcing

 

Hand 3:

 

4. I'll rebid 4NT if they settle into Spades

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. 5C with 4xC fit.

2. Strong Notrump After Pass, SNAP makes 3C GF. Still GF after 2NT =max pass.

3. Overcall Structure uses 2NT>1C as H+2nd with 7 losers. This hand fits that. Without OS, fearing their spades, 1H and fight this one out: H+D vs. S+C likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. 5. I might make this on a spade lead, or it might be cold, or it might be a good sac against 4. Anyone that thinks they will be able to defend spades is kidding themselves.

 

2. Depends on what 2N means. If its 11-12 balanced, I bid 4. If it promises support, 3 looks normal, but I might psyche a cue of 3 on my way to 6.

 

3. 1, but have sympathy for 4, although I really want the 10 for this call. By the way to Dake50: Playing Overcall Structure, 2N does show hearts + another, but the lower count is 0-4 or 0-5, depending on your standards not 7 losers. 2 show the weaker hands with /. Even if I were playing OS, I wouldn't make either call with 6/5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) 5C.

 

2) I'm not sure (Bidding 2NT as passed hand without a fit isn't my style).

 

3) 1H. No need to jump around when it could easily be our deal. Even if the opponents do have a big spade fit, I will often get to show my diamonds at a reasonable level. For example after: (1C) 1H (1S) P (2S) 3D (4S) partner is perfectly placed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. 5

2. 4. 3 should be forcing but 4 is descriptive. Slight worry that those who suggested Gerber above may not have been joking.

3. 1. May get to bid diamonds below the 5 level and involve partner in the final decision. Reluctant to use UNT with 6-5 and anyway I play it weak or strong and this isn't enough for a strong one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hand 2:  (I am presuming that 2NT shows a spade fit)

 

I'd bid 3, natural and forcing

Come on, tell the truth. If 2N shows a spade fit, you'd bid 5 (Exclusionary Blackwood).

Only 20% of the time (for example with the possession of club 6)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...