Jump to content

25 Point 5-5!!!


Recommended Posts

I'm going to start with double. I think this is vastly superior to Leaping Michaels, the latter plan will force us to drive to the 5-level to get our values across. This hand is not as good as it looks, we have 4, maybe 5 potential losers and at least one suit rounded suit rates to break poorly.

 

Starting with double also has the merit that I am more likely to find out whether partner has 4 hearts or 3. There's a huge difference on this hand, a 4th trump will let me play to draw trump and throw spades from dummy on the clubs (xxx, Qxxx, xxx, Jxx is 7).

 

Hopefully I can extract enough information to make a sensible decision later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely 4. I'm just forcing to slam, partner will never cooperate on many of the hands where it makes.

 

Not as good as it looks??? Sure if partner has no fit at all! Why are you going to assume that? You say the hand is not as good as it looks, then point out a 3 count that is a grand. That looks good to me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I never understood the popularity of "Leaping Michaels" rather than Roman Jumps. Everyone seems to be scratching their head as to what to bid with Leaping Michaels because of the club-spade problem. With Roman Jumps, you just bid the lower of two tocuhings, with a jump, revolving around if only touching that way or through their suit.

 

So, after 2, there is no ambiguity, even without precise discussion to remember. 3 for majors, 3 for spades and clubs, and 4 for clubs and hearts. (4 majors stronger)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I never understood the popularity of "Leaping Michaels" rather than Roman Jumps. Everyone seems to be scratching their head as to what to bid with Leaping Michaels because of the club-spade problem.

Which "everybody" are you referring to? Looking though the responses so far, we have four solid votes for 4, one respondent who doubles in order to keep the level low, and precisely one who expresses concern about the ambiguity of 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree we should not expect partner to cooperate. after all he has zero key cards for both of our suits. Why then is 4C better than dble? I can always bid suits forcing after the dble and then bid 5N pick to get to the best fit. It seems to me that if the 4C bidders hit their plan they still cannot get to 7 so the implied odds on 4C are poor.

 

Of course I might be making the opening lead against 2Dx. I expect -4. That might be ok since if partner has a hand to pass he probably does not have the cards for a small slam either. Adam did not give us the form of scoring and vulnerability though.

 

Finally, note that many partner hands produce 5-or-7 situations. In my example hand you need all the features to make 6 too, if you don't have running clubs and the ability to draw trumps in tempo you also have a spade loser unless partner produces the K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree we should not expect partner to cooperate. after all he has zero key cards for both of our suits. Why then is 4C better than dble? I can always bid suits forcing after the dble and then bid 5N pick to get to the best fit. It seems to me that if the 4C bidders hit their plan they still cannot get to 7 so the implied odds on 4C are poor.

Your statement about implied odds is beyond my math understanding but I disagree with the rest of this paragraph. Double, then a new suit at the cheapest level is not forcing. Even if it were, you would never be able to show a 5-5 hand - partner will assume you didn't use Leaping Michaels for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree we should not expect partner to cooperate. after all he has zero key cards for both of our suits. Why then is 4C better than dble?  I can always bid suits forcing after the dble and then bid 5N pick to get to the best fit.  It seems to me that if the 4C bidders hit their plan they still cannot get to 7 so the implied odds on 4C are poor.

Your statement about implied odds is beyond my math understanding but I disagree with the rest of this paragraph. Double, then a new suit at the cheapest level is not forcing. Even if it were, you would never be able to show a 5-5 hand - partner will assume you didn't use Leaping Michaels for a reason.

I can cuebid, then bid my suit, eg

 

(2D)-x

2S - 3D

3S -

 

Partner bidding spades repeatedly being the least informative partner action. Well, ok, I guess I am forced to leap to slam here, but at least I know we don't have a 5-4 heart fit. I pay off to partner holding SK, HQxx, whatever, Cxx with clubs 5-1 and trumps 3-2 on the left. I also pay off to partner holding a spade suit that lets me pitch the two low clubs.

 

The point about implied odds is simply that our payoff is a function of the likelihood of getting paid off, times the amount we get paid off if things go the way they need to go to get paid off. This is a common concept in poker. For example, when we consider calling with a draw to something, or more commonly a set of somethings, we need to think not about the current pot size, but about the ultimate pot size under the assumption that we hit one of the somethings we are trying to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I never understood the popularity of "Leaping Michaels" rather than Roman Jumps.  Everyone seems to be scratching their head as to what to bid with Leaping Michaels because of the club-spade problem.  With Roman Jumps, you just bid the lower of two tocuhings, with a jump, revolving around if only touching that way or through their suit.

 

So, after 2, there is no ambiguity, even without precise discussion to remember.  3 for majors, 3 for spades and clubs, and 4 for clubs and hearts.  (4 majors stronger)

So, in your method is 3h/2D(majors) not forcing because you didn't bid 4D? Is 3s(sp&cl) forcing? What is 3d/2d? A third way of showing the majors, or just looking for a stopper? Want to try the method, but need clarification --and wondering about how strong one-suiters in hearts or spades are then handled without the jump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my stupor I also don't understand why 4 has worse implied odds than double. Are you going to reach a grand if you double opposite xxx Qxxx xxx Jxx but avoid it opposite xxxx Qxxx xxx xx?

 

I echo cherdanno's concerns about getting both suits in after you double. Your next bid will have to be a cuebid and you will never get your shape across, so all this room you are saving seems like something of an illusion to me.

 

And am I being picky or are you contradicting yourself? This hand is not as good as it looks, but when partner chooses the worst auction possible for your hand you are going to guess to bid slam anyway? In that case why not show your shape to begin with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to start with double. I think this is vastly superior to Leaping Michaels, the latter plan will force us to drive to the 5-level to get our values across. This hand is not as good as it looks, we have 4, maybe 5 potential losers and at least one suit rounded suit rates to break poorly.

 

Starting with double also has the merit that I am more likely to find out whether partner has 4 hearts or 3. There's a huge difference on this hand, a 4th trump will let me play to draw trump and throw spades from dummy on the clubs (xxx, Qxxx, xxx, Jxx is 7).

 

Hopefully I can extract enough information to make a sensible decision later.

(2) - x - (5) - p

( p) - ?

 

your move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to start with double.  I think this is vastly superior to Leaping Michaels, the latter plan will force us to drive to the 5-level to get our values across.  This hand is not as good as it looks, we have 4, maybe 5 potential losers and at least one suit rounded suit rates to break poorly.

 

Starting with double also has the merit that I am more likely to find out whether partner has 4 hearts or 3.  There's a huge difference on this hand, a 4th trump will let me play to draw trump and throw spades from dummy on the clubs (xxx, Qxxx, xxx, Jxx is 7).

 

Hopefully I can extract enough information to make a sensible decision later.

(2) - x - (5) - p

( p) - ?

 

your move.

5NT, this one is easy.

 

Given their bidding, you can be certain, that you have

at least a 8 card fit.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have zero agreements, so I assume a double of 4 spades would have been penalty and so it would be if ew double now of course.

 

its IMPs, +500 will score better than -100, but so far noting has refrained me from the initial plan on playing slam, I'd sick to 5NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would take out. Having bid 4 the first time, I think we can now bid 4NT not 5NT, nothing precludes us from raising and we might learn something more about the hand.

 

Having doubled the first time, assuming LHO still bids 4, 4NT is probably natural. I probably have to bid 5NT now. I still get the main upside of my plan, which is finding out if partner has 4 hearts. Unfortunately I'm going to find that out at the 6 level. I'm still on the fence on whether or not to raise to grand if partner bids 6 over my 5NT. In the Leaping Michaels auction the 4 call is more likely be concealing a partial diamond fit than here, where it might be KQJTxxxx and out. I need 7 red cards including at least 4 hearts, along with running clubs and hearts, to make grand good.

 

The big spade bid does shift the odds a lot, though, to us being able to avoid losing slow rounded suit tricks. I can handle a spade loser if I can fade all the late rounds of clubs and hearts, so my previous argument about 5-or-7 got blown away by the 4 call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I never understood the popularity of "Leaping Michaels" rather than Roman Jumps. Everyone seems to be scratching their head as to what to bid with Leaping Michaels because of the club-spade problem. With Roman Jumps, you just bid the lower of two tocuhings, with a jump, revolving around if only touching that way or through their suit.

 

So, after 2, there is no ambiguity, even without precise discussion to remember. 3 for majors, 3 for spades and clubs, and 4 for clubs and hearts. (4 majors stronger)

I like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...