karlson Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 We did not get to a very good spot on this deal. Would you have done better? [hv=d=n&v=n&n=sahakt9xxdkjcajxx&s=skqtxxhdqtxxxxcxx]133|200|Scoring: IMP[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 1♥-1♠3♣-3NT Is that what you meant by not a very good spot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echognome Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 I bid it with Ch00 on IM. 1♥ - 1♠;3♣ - 3♦;3♥ - 4♦;4N - 5♦;6♦ - Pass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 looks like 6d down one might be a great result. Making would just be gravy at matchpoints. At IMPs, super. If it wasnt given as a problem on the forum, I doubt we would get to diamonds. Just being honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 I bid it with Ch00 on IM. 1♥ - 1♠;3♣ - 3♦;3♥ - 4♦;4N - 5♦;6♦ - Pass Was 4N intended as natural or RKC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 looks like 6d down one might be a great result. Making would just be gravy at matchpoints. At IMPs, super. If it wasnt given as a problem on the forum, I doubt we would get to diamonds. Just being honest. I would feel pretty unlucky to go down in 6♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echognome Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 I bid it with Ch00 on IM. 1♥ - 1♠;3♣ - 3♦;3♥ - 4♦;4N - 5♦;6♦ - Pass Was 4N intended as natural or RKC? With Jason, would clearly be RKCB. Note that both hands pushed in the auction. For what it's worth I was opener. Although responder hasn't shown any real strength, he hasn't limited his hand either. I just would imagine after responder bid 4♦, I would exuberant with my hand. Hard to know for sure. The final bump of 5♦ to 6♦ was speculative, but I couldn't imagine responder bidding 4♦ without the Q! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfay Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 I bid it with Ch00 on IM. 1♥ - 1♠;3♣ - 3♦;3♥ - 4♦;4N - 5♦;6♦ - Pass Was 4N intended as natural or RKC? With Jason, would clearly be RKCB. Note that both hands pushed in the auction. For what it's worth I was opener. Although responder hasn't shown any real strength, he hasn't limited his hand either. I just would imagine after responder bid 4♦, I would exuberant with my hand. Hard to know for sure. The final bump of 5♦ to 6♦ was speculative, but I couldn't imagine responder bidding 4♦ without the Q! True. Ch00's such a n00b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Hi we would end up in 3NT, gnashers auctions,although we would have an additional roundof bidding, 3D over 3C, responder searching for 3 card support. Discovering the 6-2 fit in diamonds is nearlyimpossible in a natural system. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 1♥-1♠3♣-3♦ I think it is possible to now bid 3NT and bid 5♦ with south's cards, but I don't think I wold do it at the table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.