Jump to content

One more bid?


Holding the South hand, do you?  

28 members have voted

  1. 1. Holding the South hand, do you?

    • Pass
      15
    • Make a move
      13


Recommended Posts

Cant see whats wrong with bidding 3 help suit game try.if P has 9 points in M or 4 or short game could have reasonable play .and if he doesnt 3 couldnt be too dangerous a level.

Wish 2 of the passers here whose comments i value had been more informative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all. The voting favors pass, which is what happened at the table.

 

I posted this because it was a BBO teams board and the result at both tables was 2 +4 (!) for +230 and a push board.

      http://tinyurl.com/lgss9g

Well, the dummy is pretty much max, has heart values for declarer, and just about everything that could sit right in the opps hands does so.

 

Playing the way I do (with an outlet for strong two type hands and therefore responder doesn't need to say anything with crap), then I think this is a clear game try hand. However, playing standard, I would be nervous holding opener's hand - a game try could be right - and we could be down in three sometimes I think - so I have sympathies with those who would pass.

 

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant see whats wrong with bidding 3 help suit game try.if P has 9 points in M or 4 or short game could have reasonable play .and if he doesnt 3 couldnt be too dangerous a level.

Wish 2 of the passers here whose comments i value had been more informative.

Informative: Bad trumps = danger. 3 is likely to be very dangerous.

 

Sometimes you miss a not-vul game which makes 6 on 3 out of 3 finesses, two 3-2 breaks in important suits, and the wrong lead! Notice that if you simply remove the jack of spades from dummy, partner would probably bid game over the game try on his 8 count with QJx of your suit, and now game is absolutely awful and even 3 is down a ton of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all. The voting favors pass, which is what happened at the table.

 

I posted this because it was a BBO teams board and the result at both tables was 2 +4 (!) for +230 and a push board.

      http://tinyurl.com/lgss9g

Switch the north and south hands, and E/W lose 2 more tricks.

 

If clubs split anything but ideally, OR opening lead is a diamond, the diamond loser becomes unavoidable (given best defense, which I don't think is too hard to find.)

 

It's not just the J, either. Lose the J or the T and you lose another trick, I think.

 

Oops, just reread jdonn's post, and I think I plagiarized him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wonder why Josh is passing. Maybe he is getting old.

 

YOu have 15 HCps, two doubeltons and just aces and supported kings. You have just 6 losers, what do you need more for an invitation? The only downside is the bad trump suit, but with Aces and kings anywhere else, I am still happy to invite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only downside is the bad trump suit

And other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?

 

This hand is a perfect example of why counting points and losers can not substitute for judgment. AKT8x ATxx xx Ax is WAY (WAY!) better of a hand than T8xxx ATxx AK Ax. Same points, same AKs, same losers. And I don't even have to be old to realize it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only downside is the bad trump suit

And other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?

 

This hand is a perfect example of why counting points and losers can not substitute for judgment. AKT8x ATxx xx Ax is WAY (WAY!) better of a hand than T8xxx ATxx AK Ax. Same points, same AKs, same losers. And I don't even have to be old to realize it.

Your nice judgement leads to 2 Spade +4 well done.

 

 

I had enjoyed the play in 4 spade, thank you.

 

What is the worst case scenario? Something like Qxx,Qxx,Qxx,xxxx opposite my hand? Oh wait, even then I may make 3 Spade.

 

 

Your example hand is even better then the one we hold, because it has stronger trumps.

But I guess anybody and his grandma will at least invite with

AKxxx, QJx, QJx,KQ and this hand is not stronger then the example hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I haven't mentioned but I would invite opposite 8-10. But why do you think that's what the raise was?

I agree all the points Josh has made so far. I was the 2 bidder at the table and I thought this hand was on the heavy side for a 2 raise. The bid could easily have been 3 HCP lighter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice set of hands here. Has anyone run a sim?

 

For me, if playing constructive raises, I have to invite.

 

But if playing my "normal" raises and Bergen (so that resp doesn't have 4 card support on this sequence) I just wimp it and pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I haven't mentioned but I would invite opposite 8-10. But why do you think that's what the raise was?

I agree all the points Josh has made so far. I was the 2 bidder at the table and I thought this hand was on the heavy side for a 2 raise. The bid could easily have been 3 HCP lighter.

The system used is not mentioned.If playing sayc 2 can be lighter but playing 2/1 the lighter hands are shown via a forcing NT by many players.So I think 1-2 would be a good 7 to bad 10 raise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all. The voting favors pass, which is what happened at the table.

 

I posted this because it was a BBO teams board and the result at both tables was 2 +4 (!) for +230 and a push board.

      http://tinyurl.com/lgss9g

Switch the north and south hands, and E/W lose 2 more tricks.

 

If clubs split anything but ideally, OR opening lead is a diamond, the diamond loser becomes unavoidable (given best defense, which I don't think is too hard to find.)

 

It's not just the J, either. Lose the J or the T and you lose another trick, I think.

 

Oops, just reread jdonn's post, and I think I plagiarized him.

Yes. I would have passed. Would pass again, this is an odds against game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a partnership were playing constructive raises it is the sort of hand that a person wants to make a move. You could catch the right sort of hand, yet at the same time you would have to ask yourself how comfortable you will be at the 3 level facing soft trumps. As there sort of person who hates to miss games I would try, have my "I'm sorry pard" card ready. Opposite a hand that may not be constructive it's not even close for me. Bottom line is I need a solid H support position in addition to decent trumps, all this for what might be 6 imps swing? Not me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...