Jump to content

negative double


Recommended Posts

I'm confused

 

"Everybody" knows that auctions like

 

1m-1M-x

1M-2m-x

 

show the other major, at least 4 cards, "no exceptions allowed"

 

Which is the lowest auction that a negative double does not systemically promise 4 card support in an unbid major?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think it promises the other major, because you might have a 6 card suit in the unbid minor and not enough to go 2/1.

 

Bill

I don't think you can have it both ways. If you say you will double if you have some values and 4 cards in the other major, but also do it with a weak hand and long other suit, what do you do when opener with 4 cards in the major and a good hand jumps to game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your agreement is that it shows 4 cards in the unbid major, then it applies to the level you agree that negative doubles apply up to. In my partnerships this is only up to the 2 level. Above that, doubles are "values", no guarantee of shape other than "balanced", and are often passed for penalty. A distributional opener will of course bid on.

 

I have seen many cards saying negative doubles up to 4, but it seems pointless to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gwnn you're looking at this wrong. It shows 4 in the other major (for example), 98% of the time on the 1 level, 92% of the time on the 2 level, 80% of the time on the 3 level, 65% of the time on the 4 level, or something like that. The function has a descending slope of some kind, it isn't uniform to a point followed by a steep drop off.

 

All you are really asking is at what arbitrary percentage point "no exceptions allowed (except when they are)" becomes "exceptions sometimes allowed" which is not all that meaningful of a question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused

 

"Everybody" knows that auctions like

 

1m-1M-x

 

snipped

 

show the other major, at least 4 cards, "no exceptions allowed"

snipped

No! Everyone doesn't. You would no doubt be aware that there have been many discussions on this site where many people have said they play 1m (1H) x as categorically denying 4+S. The rationale being that if you have a S suit, why not bid it?

 

1D (2C) x may not even have a hand with one 4 card M, though this is rare of course.

 

By the way, I have frequnlty seen expert cards with -ve doubles through 7H. 4S is certainly the norm and, no Fromage, I don't find it pointless at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many players seemed to have some restricted vision with regard to a neg dble. Many feel it should show 4 cards in the other major, and 1C 1D dble to be 4-4 majors. I find this approach far too restrictive.

 

The facts of the matter are when your rho over-calls you want to take the opportunity to inform partner you have a reason to compete, dble is most often the only way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gwnn you're looking at this wrong. It shows 4 in the other major (for example), 98% of the time on the 1 level, 92% of the time on the 2 level, 80% of the time on the 3 level, 65% of the time on the 4 level, or something like that. The function has a descending slope of some kind, it isn't uniform to a point followed by a steep drop off.

I think there is a jump at the 3-level though. Over 1D-(3C) you won't have to double without a 4-card major very often, since when you have a suit, you can bid it. Over 1D-(3S), you cannot bid your club suit unless you are willing to bypass 3NT.

So up to 3m, I would say the negative double "shows" at least one unbid 4-card major. From 3M on, there are really no guarantees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...