Jump to content

Reality check


GF or invitational+  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. GF or invitational+

    • Forcing to game
      47
    • Invitational or better (NF)
      3
    • Invitational or better (F1)
      0


Recommended Posts

"BBO Best hand experience! Is it really GF ? I saved deal."

 

Absolutely gf in standard methods. GIB is not noted for its bidding. Anyway, as Wayne points out, the given hand is close enough to a gf to make it only a mild overbid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Ant, GF is unanimous. Can we know the background and result of the bet(s), please?

I play with someone locally and we were practicing in the bidding room. The sequence

 

1NT - 2

2 - 3

4

 

came up, and I asked what he plays the difference between 3 and 4 as. It turns out he bids 3 "to play", because he was under the impression that 3 was inv+ in standard.

 

We play in an event that has very nice cakes during the break, so I bet that if 10% of the poll or greater agreed with him I would buy said cake. I now, unless the poll shifts radically, get cake bought for me :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% gf in all versions of standard bidding.

 

Does that mean the same as 'I hold a hand that will make game opposite your hand'? No. So, to karluk, when GIB (and I can't think of anyone else who would hold up a GIB bid as an exemplar of 'standard' bidding!) forced to game with void AKxxx xxx J9xxx... how else are you bidding? Transfer to hearts and pass? Opposite, say Jxxx Qx AKx AKxx, you miss an almost laydown small slam and a decent grand! So everyone and his dog would gf on that hand... knowing that on a bad day we fail in whichever game we reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the other way of putting it for Hamdi's benefit is that yes there may be some (a few) hands that are 5/4 in hearts/clubs where 3C is a make and 2H and 2N are not - typically where opener is 2/4 in the same suits. However this is a) quite a small target to aim at in terms of constructing a system and b] 2N will often be better when opener turns out to have been 2/3 instead. Thus reserving 3C, on this sequence, as forcing makes a lot more sense.

 

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Source : BBO today

 

Partner opens 1NT (15-17 balanced). Say righty passed. You did a transfer bid to hearts. Partner completes it. Now what ? Pass or 3 ? Sorry but I don't think South has GF values.

 

[hv=d=n&v=b&s=s8hj8743d72ckqj62]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Source : BBO today

 

Partner opens 1NT (15-17 balanced). Say righty passed. You did a transfer bid to hearts. Partner completes it. Now what ? Pass or 3 ? Sorry but I don't think South has GF values.

 

[hv=d=n&v=b&s=s8hj8743d72ckqj62]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv]

Pass of course. No super accept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Source : BBO today

 

Partner opens 1NT (15-17 balanced). Say righty passed. You did a transfer bid to hearts. Partner completes it. Now what ? Pass or 3 ? Sorry but I don't think South has GF values.

 

[hv=d=n&v=b&s=s8hj8743d72ckqj62]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv]

For sure you don't have GF values. But you're missing the point. Change the J to the A and now you do - would you want to be passed out in 3? Or are you prepared to bid something like 4 with that hand and waste a lot of bidding room?

 

The vast majority of people - including people like me who usually play Acol (for the cynics read, "bid what you think you can make") tend to regard the 3 bid on this sequence as forcing.

 

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Source : BBO today

 

Partner opens 1NT (15-17 balanced). Say righty passed. You did a transfer bid to hearts. Partner completes it. Now what ? Pass or 3 ? Sorry but I don't think South has GF values.

 

Dealer: North
Vul: Both
Scoring: MP
8
J8743
72
KQJ62
 

Sorry, but I don't understand your point.

 

Bridge bidding is a set of compromises. It is impossible to cater, accurately, to all hand types. On the 1=5=2=5 7 count, obviously it would be nice to be able to show both suits and stop in 3 or 3 when right.

 

But, experience, over 70+ years of bridge by thousands of good players and millions of not so good has shown that it is MORE useful to use the sequence of transfer then new suit as GF. (Note to nitpickers, I know transfers are a relatively recent development).

 

So a good player, using these methods, would transfer and then either overbid (by making a gf) or pass...either needs some luck to be the optimum spot. Too bad. Only fools think that bidding can be perfected.

 

So, Hamdi, in STANDARD bidding, the transfer than new suit is GF. You are welcome to play it otherwise... do it long enough and I suspect that you will learn what others already have. But in standard, it is gf, and all of your examples as to why you think it shouldn't be won't change that reality.

 

One of the hallmarks of the improving player is a willingness to listen to and learn from better players.... one of the hallmarks of the crank is to demonstrate a lack of knowledge and then to get angry with those who point out one's errors...which category do you want to be seen as representing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...