Jump to content

how strong is 3D?


kgr

Recommended Posts

MP's

1-(Pass)-1-(DBL)

REDBL-(Pass)-Pass-(2)

3/Pass/DBL..??

 

RDBL=support ReDBL

Opps bidding is not very clear, but you can expect opp to have an opening with a 6-card .

 

If opener has a good 6-card . What is the strength of the 3 bid and what should normally be done with a stonger hand and no stopper?

(At the table I was the 1 bidder and had an opening. Bidding would have been easier if I would have bid 3NT iso passing the REBDL).

Edited by kgr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was an article in the BW that discussed responder's obligations after a support redouble.

 

If Responder passes; it should be at least an invitational hand. Else, responder retreats to 2x. The theory the opponents are never letting you play 1 xx'd, so you might as well try to clarify responder's strength asap. This is the way I prefer to play if for no other reason is that it adds clarity to auctions like the OP's.

 

If responder is showing an invitational hand or better, I cannot believe that a pass is only forcing through 2. I would think it goes at least through 2N, maybe 3m and possibly 3.

 

2 is a strange bid if responder is showing values by passing, but we should still try to logically define opener's calls. I would say:

 

Double = penalty oriented.

Pass = forcing but unclear as to direction.

3 = offensive minimum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would every opening bid with 3-card heart support redouble? It is fortunate that the opponents have let you both try to start describing your size and shape at the 3-level instead of higher. There is something wrong in a situation where the opponents have taken up none of your bidding space at the one-level, and you have used none of that space.

 

If redouble was ok on AX XXX KQTXXX AX or A XXX AQJTXXX QX, I guess 3D would be ok now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 is just not a subminimum (or very minimum) with six decent diamonds.

 

With a better hand you can cue-bid 3.

 

Your methods did not serve you well here.

 

You have a lot of bids without three-card support and only one bid (call) on a diverse range of hands with three hearts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=n=skxhkxxdakxxxxcax&s=satxhaqxxdxxxcqxx]133|200|[/hv]

1-(Pass)-1-(DBL)

RDBL-(Pass)-Pass*-(2)

3-(Pass)-3NT-All Pass

 

3NT+4 ( 2-2 and RHO did discard 's)

 

Still not sure if Pass* should be minimal or Inv+. The problem with inv+ seems to be that you would have a difficult bid with same distribution and only 6 pts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=n=skxhkxxdakxxxxcax&s=satxhaqxxdxxxcqxx]133|200|[/hv]

1-(Pass)-1-(DBL)

RDBL-(Pass)-Pass*-(2)

3-(Pass)-3NT-All Pass

 

3NT+4 ( 2-2 and RHO did discard 's)

 

Still not sure if Pass* should be minimal or Inv+. The problem with inv+ seems to be that you would have a difficult bid with same distribution and only 6 pts.

Perfect for an agreement that shows six diamonds and three hearts and a good opening hand:

 

1 (Pass) 1 (Dbl)

3* (Pass) 4 (?**)

...

 

We are well on our way to 6.

 

* 6+ diamonds 3+ hearts (15)16-18 HCP

 

4 is slammish

 

** will the opponent bid spades now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...