Jump to content

what is ur rebid ?


Recommended Posts

One of my best strategies over time has been passing a weak two bid on certain hands with three card support. People forget the opponents don't know how many trumps we have.

Agree with this too. It takes -200 out of the equation a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Asking random stars is pointless.

LOL; Match up four of the top 10 posters (number, not ability) against four random stars in a 12 board team game. I would spot the random stars 1 IMP per board.

 

My wallet would be quite fat after awhile.

Given that you would be in the top 10 (under pclayton), of course it would. You would select yourself and toss IMP's by the bucket.

 

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that you would be in the top 10 (under pclayton), of course it would.

Look pclayton doesn't exist anymore OK? He was thrown out of town after he bid 5 one too many times, didn't make takeout doubles on 4333 13 counts, never pre-balanced, and preempted according to the vulnerabilty.

 

I do see he makes an occasional appearance though. I think he's hiding out in the desert area or something dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume I am not here to argue:

 

"A cue bid by the takeout doubler does not promise (or deny) support, so the option of a cue bid and passing a 2♥ rebid exists but has no special meaning. " per ArtK78

 

"LOL; Match up four of the top 10 posters (number, not ability) against four random stars in a 12 board team game. I would spot the random stars 1 IMP per board. " Per Phil

 

"asking random stars is pointless" per hangp

 

the issue is how to bid a game with the hand you hold that you see versus a possible hand ranging fom the real hand I showed

 

XX QJXXX XX QJXX to a bust hand he was forced to bid with 1H after the takeout double. The majority of stars and participants here with the same bid do share the shadow with a possible hand the 1H bidder might have such as XXX XXXX XXX XXX or even worse XXX XXX XXXX XXX

 

I was expecting a few participants here could give applause to the bidding sequence one turkish star offer ( be him a random or not) :

 

P P 1D X

P 1H

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry i hit the wrong keystroke right before i finish the writing :

 

P P 1D X

1H P P 2D

repeating

 

he would bid 4H on any rebid other than 2H ; and press on with 3H versus the 2H rebid

 

Precpj

So what has he gained over bidding 3 immediately, and letting his partner bid 4 when it's right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think rebidding after a takeout double is probably the area of bidding that has changed the most in the relatively short time since I learned to play bridge. I first learned raising shows significant extras (this hand), raising to 3 shows very significant extras, and cuebidding showed something like the equivalent of a 2 opener and tended to deny direct support for partner (since if you had it you could just raise). But now that people want to raise with less and less, the double raise is much lighter, and the cuebid is often made on a wide variety of hands with a lot less extra values than I first learned were needed, and may or may not have support.

 

I'm trying to keep up. I think 2 was right 10 or 15 years ago and 3 is right (meaning expected by an expert across from you) today. But this is one of the only areas in which I consider myself old fashioned, and I would really prefer to be able to just bid 2 on this. I don't want to go down in 3 sometimes just for the joy of raising without any real extras when the opponents aren't even fighting for the hand yet.

Great stuff Josh, and not because I totally agree.

Josh and Phil - thanks for making me feel less old. Agree 110%.

 

It seems like the 2 nowadays means something, "In case you didn't see it the first time, or don't believe me, I have a takeout double" (i.e. an opening hand and support for the unbid suits -- including hearts).

 

If the adjunct is that I have to play at the 3-level with 16 or 17 opposite a forced response, then in this respect, for my money, thanks but no thanks on the "modern trend."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume I am not here to argue:

 

"A cue bid by the takeout doubler does not promise (or deny) support, so the option of a cue bid and passing a 2♥ rebid exists but has no special meaning. " per ArtK78

You took this out of context - it was part of a non-standard system of bidding after a takeout double.

 

Having said that, I still don't understand the point you were trying to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Partner has values.  If he was a complete bust, RHO or LHO would do something more than has happened so far.  So, bid where you live.  3.

 

2 is right on shape.  If you changed the A-K of clubs to the 3-2, that's a 2 hand.

So you would raise to 2H on

♠AT63 ♥AK72♦632♣32

 

Nice when partner has xxx xxx xxxx xxx

You can change a couple of xs to a couple of Qs and Js.

 

Partner has values? He hasn't shown them.

Partner doesn't have to show values. The opponents have passed throughout. I'll pay off to the pair who with a combined 31 HCP finds all of these passes and then catches us in the rare 7-fit.

 

Now, admittedly changing A-K to 3-2 was a bit overboard. A bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the responses when I posed this to Stars " Hi may I please ask how u would rebid after making a takeout X as the bidding went P P 1D X P 1H P (?)Your hand is : ATXX AKXX XXX AK " and more than a dozen of them came back with their help gracefully.

 

The major majority of them voiced 2H along with their remarks:

 

"2H; 2h shows a big hand "

"1H could be a forced 3 cards preference with busted hand "

"I can not argue agaisnt 3H "

 

when I asked one 2H replier " how do u score the answers 2D 2H or 3H " "3H is worst .." He did like the 2D suggestion I meant to ask how they will score as in "It is your call" in the ACBL Bulletine :)

 

2 ( out of north america) came in with 3H and one from Far East with 4H ( i wonder if the star follow the sequence I posed. :o

 

it is very fun to collect 3 2D replies from them ; one of the 3 came in 2H first and changed to 2D while i was expressing my gratitude. the most interesting one is the turkish star who shared his trend of thoughts

 

" i bid 2d and bid game if my partner rebid is other than 2H; on 2h rebid i push on with 3H " a great process of communication :huh:

 

well it is time to reveal the hand of the 1H bidder

 

XX QJ65454 QJ94 a perfect bingo

 

I have invited the Host ( expert rated) who was about to boot me at the table ( 2D and 2H were 100 % incorrect in his view :( ) and the oppo who politely voiced his 3H choice to read or join the discussion here. After all , I would like to remind them again Life is a never ending process

 

Precpj

Well you see this is interesting. I would have bid 2H with this hand as responder to the doubler. I have a 5th heart and all of my points are concentrated in 2 suits. This is a 6 point hand only for bean counters. And "yes" I know I have only quacks, but still, this is far better than a 2H bid imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the responses when I posed this to Stars " Hi may I please ask how u would rebid after making a takeout X as the bidding went P P 1D X P 1H P (?)Your hand is : ATXX AKXX XXX AK " and more than a dozen of them came back with their help gracefully.

 

The major majority of them voiced 2H along with their remarks:

 

"2H; 2h shows a big hand "

"1H could be a forced 3 cards preference with busted hand "

"I can not argue agaisnt 3H "

 

when I asked one 2H replier " how do u score the answers 2D 2H or 3H " "3H is worst .." He did like the 2D suggestion I meant to ask how they will score as in "It is your call" in the ACBL Bulletine :)

 

2 ( out of north america) came in with 3H and one from Far East with 4H ( i wonder if the star follow the sequence I posed. :o

 

it is very fun to collect 3 2D replies from them ; one of the 3 came in 2H first and changed to 2D while i was expressing my gratitude. the most interesting one is the turkish star who shared his trend of thoughts

 

" i bid 2d and bid game if my partner rebid is other than 2H; on 2h rebid i push on with 3H " a great process of communication :huh:

 

well it is time to reveal the hand of the 1H bidder

 

XX QJ65454 QJ94 a perfect bingo

 

I have invited the Host ( expert rated) who was about to boot me at the table ( 2D and 2H were 100 % incorrect in his view :( ) and the oppo who politely voiced his 3H choice to read or join the discussion here. After all , I would like to remind them again Life is a never ending process

 

Precpj

Well you see this is interesting. I would have bid 2H with this hand as responder to the doubler. I have a 5th heart and all of my points are concentrated in 2 suits. This is a 6 point hand only for bean counters. And "yes" I know I have only quacks, but still, this is far better than a 2H bid imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well it is time to reveal the hand of the 1H bidder

 

XX QJ65454 QJ94 a perfect bingo

 

I have invited the Host ( expert rated) who was about to  boot me at the table ( 2D and 2H were 100 % incorrect in his view :huh: ) and the oppo who politely voiced his 3H choice to read or join the discussion here.

This is a maximum for the 1 bid (and I wouldn't argue with an initial 2 bid), so not bidding over a raise is very poor. IMO this hand gets the bulk of the blame for missing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An initial 2H bid with that hand is absurd in my humble opinion, and I think the hand does not act over a 2H bid. This is nowhere near a maximum 1H bid.

Not that I'm trying to convince you, but from

a 4333 garbage hand to the posted one is a very wide range. the posted hand is an 8 loser hand after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well it is time to reveal the hand of the 1H bidder

 

XX QJ65454 QJ94 a perfect bingo

 

I have invited the Host ( expert rated) who was about to  boot me at the table ( 2D and 2H were 100 % incorrect in his view :( ) and the oppo who politely voiced his 3H choice to read or join the discussion here.

This is a maximum for the 1 bid (and I wouldn't argue with an initial 2 bid), so not bidding over a raise is very poor. IMO this hand gets the bulk of the blame for missing game.

I think this hand is an easy 1 rather than 2 , but when pd (the doubler) raises to 2 , I think bidding anything less than 4 is an underbid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the 1 bidder was wrong not to bid game after 2 .

But maybe he was a modern player who thought that 2 from partner does not show more then 13-14 HCPS.

 

For bidding 1 or 2 heart with his hand: IN NA this is a no brainer, 1 Heart can be even stronger then this.

In Germany (and obviously iN Astralia) taste differs and I have sympathy for a 2 HEart bid but I would not choose it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2h response to the X is out of the circle of good bridge I can bet my pocket on that:) 2H is commonly played as 9+ HCP 4+ card as a non passed hand ; since the 1H bidder was a passed hand 2H would be close to at most a Q away from open 4+ cards

 

so is the raise of 2H with a less than 16 total support points

 

bidding 2H as I did at the table risks the pass as it happned at the table

 

3H raise runs the risk of a bust hand

 

if you are going along these thoughts which are also similarly echoed by many stars ( I asked many more ) I approached for help, why not consider the merit of 2D ? which happens to be as popular as 2H if not more. After all 2D cue is a free option

 

my nick is precpj ; in case you want to know whom I ask please leave the message calling " asking stars randomly is pointless.." etc or tossing dirt on general skills of Stars is a sad encounter in this excercise

 

Precpj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you like to have million ways to raise heart but no bid for a hand where you are strong but cannot bid NT?

 

I would bid 2 Diamond with the later.

 

Sorry, but passing 2 Heart is "out of the circle of good bridge" when you know that partner promised 4 hearts and 16+ HCPs.

 

You bid your hand the same way with xxx,xxx,xxxxx,xx and with the given hand?

 

A direct 2 answer to the X is a much lesser dissortion of the hand (it still is of course an overbid).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I don't open 1NT with a nice 12 either. "

 

Josh, that is a silly comment. That remark has no relevance at all.

No, your argument is essentially "I have 6, but it's a very good 6." But 6 is so much outside the range of the bid you are suggesting that my "silly" comment is exactly equivalent to the argument you are making. Even if you don't realize it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am late to this thread, so don't have a lot to offer over and above what has been posted. I am, however, very much with josh and the others who think this hand is worth only a 2 bid.

 

Yes, it is sexy to bid a lot..... but my experience has been that overbidding doesn't actually work all that well ;)

 

If 1 shows 0-8 hcp, as it does in all standard approaches with which I am familiar, there can be only 2 reasons to bid 2 as the doubler.

 

One would be preemptive... we are afraid that LHO will successfully balance.

 

Wait a sec... this is the LHO who PASSED over our double? And if he does balance, are we then barred if we hold a decent double with 4 card support?

 

Yes, on occasion, the opps will back in successfully and push us to the 3-level.... but this will occur infrequently, given their passivity to this point.

 

The second reason is to invite game: we announce to partner that opposite a 0-8 hand, we have game interest.... and with the actual hand he ought to be shot if he passed 2... maybe, with no Aces or Kings, he might decide only to raise to 3, but then we, with a heavy 2 raise, bid game.

 

The alternative so-called 'modern' approach will get us overboard many times. In particular, having to bid 3 on this hand is a recipe for -100 against +110... and I don't care who you are... spot the opps 5 imps on baby hands like this, and they rate to beat you like a drum.

 

While the scheme I (and I suspect others) learned long ago may be 'old', it is still logical:

 

pass: normal double

 

2: interest in game opposite a max

 

3: interest in game opposite anything better than a horrible hand

 

cue then raise hearts: interest in slam opposite a max.

 

Note: double then cue doesn't promise 4 hearts but does create a forcing auction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the scheme I (and I suspect others) learned long ago may be 'old', it is still logical:

 

pass: normal double

 

2: interest in game opposite a max

 

3: interest in game opposite anything better than a horrible hand

 

cue then raise hearts: interest in slam opposite a max.

 

Note: double then cue doesn't promise 4 hearts but does create a forcing auction.

"old" is good enough for me, provided (also an old concept) that my takeout doubles show takeout double hands, and not just 13 cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...