too many ways to raise partner

[rbforster]

Partner opens a limited 1♠ and it's up to you how to raise. You have lots of methods (see poll). What's your choice?

 

[hv=d=n&s=skt9xxxhdq9ckq9xx]133|100|1♠-?

 

* 5+♠, 9-15 hcp[/hv]

(for reference, usually 10-12 with a fit is an invite, although obviously this has lots more shape than usual!)

 

Edit: the strong jump shift option is natural, showing a good suit (2/3 tops). Bidding 4H next shows 4+ support, heart shortness, and at least GF values.

[JLOL]

What is the vulnerability and form of scoring? I'd usually bid 4S.

[rbforster]

You can specify if you want - matchpoints, don't recall the colors.

[Tola18]

Part of the answer is probably, how I do evaluate the hand (and possibly partner a) overall playing strengh :) his form as today and now).

 

Ie, if Im contend with game - 4S at once is appropriate here.

If I think there are slam chances - I should use some searching method...

 

 

Observe.

In the beginners manual it is only invite. Say a limit 3sp. More experienced players dont stop there...

[hanp]

4H.

[whereagles]

4♥ is to play, I guess??? :)

 

Anyway, 4♠. Maybe this steals the pot. If not, I'll take push to 5.

[655321]

I would bid 2NT.

 

Then depending on what happens next, we might still show heart shortage.

[Codo]

I normally hate splinters which are direct below the own game level. But here the hand is perfect. Partner will bid more with good values in the other suits and in that case, slam is reasonable.

 

The lower approach will sometimes be heavily disturbed by heart or two suiter bids, so I would take the high road to describe my hand.

[mtvesuvius]

I like 4♥ here... it also has a nice pre-emptive value :)

[ochinko]

2♣ for me. 4♥ I would bid with

 

♠KQxxxx

♥

♦xx

♣KQxxx

 

but I wouldn't mind much if partner bids 4♥.

[dicklont]

2♣ for me. 4♥ I would bid with

 

♠KQxxxx

♥

♦xx

♣KQxxx

 

but I wouldn't mind much if partner bids 4♥.

You have 11 spades, ♠Q will drop anyway, but ♦Q could be very usefull.

[dake50]

Do I have H-exclusion A-ask? Below 4S answers preferred.

[whereagles]

guys, 1♠ is 11-15. Showing your hand here isn't the correct strategy: the time is to make decisions.

[Phil]

At MPs I would always 4♠.

 

At IMPs I would 3♣. I think there's enough of a chance of a slam that I want to shoot for it.

[skjaeran]

It's not as much a question of describing the hand best as to give yourself the best chance for a good result.

 

4♠ for me, shut out opps.

[ochinko]

Why do you have to shut out opps when you hold the boss' suit? You are shutting out partner with a hand that has so much slam potential in it.

[hanp]

I think this hand has too much slam potential to bash 4S. It is true that 4H gives the opponents a chance to double and find their sac, but I think the chance of finding a good slam outweighs this risk.

[skjaeran]

Why do you have to shut out opps when you hold the boss' suit? You are shutting out partner with a hand that has so much slam potential in it.

That's because they might find a very good sac. I'd be much more inclined to bid a fitjump 4♣ than splinter 4♥.

[whereagles]

I think this hand has too much slam potential to bash 4S. It is true that 4H gives the opponents a chance to double and find their sac, but I think the chance of finding a good slam outweighs this risk.

That is correct, but are you sure your system is good enough that you can find the key cards in pard, e.g.

 

AQxxx

xxx

Kxx

Ax

 

I do have an idea on how to bid this construtively: when I used to play precision, splinters where not showing bids, but asking bids. In this case, if it went

 

1♠ 4♥

 

opener would rebid 4NT showing a min with no heart wastage. Maybe you'd get there then.

[jeffmcgow]

Why do you have to shut out opps when you hold the boss' suit? You are shutting out partner with a hand that has so much slam potential in it.

That's because they might find a very good sac. I'd be much more inclined to bid a fitjump 4♣ than splinter 4♥.

As it's matchpoints a quick auction also gives you the chance of 13 tricks on a non-diamond lead when you have two top losers in diamonds. So a direct 4♠ for me.