Jump to content

f1 or fg?


Recommended Posts

Unfav, IMPs. You have agreed on 2/1.

 

You deal and open 1. LHO intervenes with 1, and your partned bids 2. How much force has his bid?

 

Let's say RHO passes, you now bid 2NT, LHO passes, and partner raises to 3. What does this look like - sign off, invitation or forcing to game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forcing for one round, 10+.

The 3 rebid is done with a 10-12 hand.

 

Many play 2 as non-forcing, 8-11 HCP.

I don't like that treatment, it either messes up your negative double or your cuebid.

I want the cuebid in to show support, not random strong hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like that treatment, it either messes up your negative double or your cuebid.

 

Either treatment is okay, strong bridge nations like Poland have NF freebids as standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like that treatment, it either messes up your negative double or your cuebid.

 

Either treatment is okay, strong bridge nations like Poland have NF freebids as standard.

How well does the NFB fit in with the Polish Club? I don't have enough experience with this to have an informed opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F1. I know of no system where 2D is GF. Also, what common system you play, has nothing to do with whether 2D is forcing or not forcing because it is a matter of partnership agreement. Standard is F1, at least where I play, while NFB is playable if it was agreed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...