nick_s Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 [hv=d=s&v=b&n=skj5hj1082d9843c106&w=sa9864h943dqck852&e=sq32hdakj65cqj973&s=s107hakq765d1072ca4]399|300|Scoring: MP1♥ (1♠) 3♥ (4♥)5♥ P P (X)P P P[/hv] 3♥ was weak, 4 card support. Both of us claimed we messed up. What do you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 I agree with both of you, but N was worse. His hand doesn't look anything like a 3♥ bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Both of us claimed we messed up. What do you think? I think you have a head start over most partnerships, and you should reach a more detailed agreement about what 3♥ means. In some of my partnerships 3♥ would be fine; in others it would have too much defence. By the way, the final contract is an excellent sacrifice against 6♣ by West. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo81 Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 I blame mostly North. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 50-50 I'd say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted April 27, 2009 Report Share Posted April 27, 2009 52% to North and 60% to South, sorry 655321. 3♥ is decent, but is lacks shape. 5♥ is counting on shape from partner, but I really don't like it at equal colors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.