Hanoi5 Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Playing SAYC, it goes Pass on your right and being Vul vs NV you hold: ♠KT9642♥97♦7♣A632 Do you open with a weak-2 in spades or pass? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 I would, thanks for the 109. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
655321 Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 What hanp said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 No I don't like a weak 2 here r/w in 2nd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 If you don't open this 2♠ here you might as well not play weak 2 bids. The spade spots and shape make it automatic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 as above Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 If you don't open this 2♠ here you might as well not play weak 2 bids. The spade spots and shape make it automatic. Suppose that I believed that in second seat at adverse a weak two should have a one-loser suit. Are you saying that I'd be better off playing 2♠ as something completely different, and if so what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 I would open this 2♠ always... Probably even without the 9. I have weak 2 bids on the card for a reason, and I'm gonna use them! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 If you don't open this 2♠ here you might as well not play weak 2 bids. The spade spots and shape make it automatic. Suppose that I believed that in second seat at adverse a weak two should have a one-loser suit. Are you saying that I'd be better off playing 2♠ as something completely different, and if so what? I'm saying your belief about second seat weak 2 bids means your style of weak 2 bids is very bad, and I have no interest in deciding what you should play instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 weak 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOL Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Not as auto as jdonn says but yeah I would do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Not as auto as jdonn says but yeah I would do it. Oh, I see. You're wondering about opening THREE spades. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Not as auto as jdonn says but yeah I would do it. Oh, I see. You're wondering about opening THREE spades. :P He may even be considering 1♥! :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keylime Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 I'm opening, not too happily, but to attack the heart/diamond partials. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.