cnszsun Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 [hv=d=n&v=n&s=sq109xxhxdakxxxxxc]133|100|Scoring: IMP1♣-2♥-??[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Let me do something weird and bid my longest suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 3♦ then spades. May be a misfit, but we have to bid our hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 I heard today that a good Dutch pair plays that 1S - (2H) - 3C is game-forcing but pass over 1S - (2H) - 3C - (3H) is not forcing. Does that make any sense? [edited, thanks Phil] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 I heard today that a good Dutch pair plays that 1S - (2H) - 3C is forcing (snip) Forcing to what? but pass over 1S - (2H) - 3C - (3H) is not forcing. Does that make any sense? If 3♣ is GF, then pass as NF makes no sense. If 3♣ is F1, then pass as NF makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 3♦, I'll try to pattern out as best as possible... I'll bid ♠ next time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOL Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 3d Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 2♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 I heard today that a good Dutch pair plays that 1S - (2H) - 3C is game-forcing but pass over 1S - (2H) - 3C - (3H) is not forcing. Does that make any sense? [edited, thanks Phil] It's not just a bad idea, it means one of the two statements is a lie since they don't reconcile with each other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted April 10, 2009 Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 3♦, I'll try to pattern out as best as possible... I'll bid ♠ next time. Me too.. me too... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.