shevek Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 [hv=d=w&v=b&s=s987haj76d2cakj53]133|100|Scoring: IMP1♠ - 2♦ - no - ?[/hv] Common enough is advancer's new suit forcing & 2♠ as a diamond raise. You may not like that, you may prefer 2♠ as "unassuming". Let's say partner's style is normal so 2♦ = near opening, often 6-carder.Anyway, what is your plan? (EW take no further part) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 I make a take-out double :) Ok, since I can't do that, 3♣. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walddk Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Despite the singleton in partner's suit this hand is too good to pass vulnerable at IMPs. I bid 3♣, pass the rebid of 3♦ or 3NT and bid 3♠ over 3♥, because 3♥ may not be a suit. Could be a feature. If it is, overcaller has no spade stop. The worst case scenario is that we end up in 4mi, which could be too high. However, I am willing to gamble on that in the search for the vulnerable game. Roland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 I make a negative double... Oh, I cannot double my partner? 3♣ for me ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 3C is clear imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 If I bid 3♣ and partner bids 3♥ over that, does the meaning depend on whether we play ELC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.