Phil Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 MPs, none vul ♠QT ♥KQJxxx ♦QTx ♣J9 1♣ - 1♥1♠ - ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 3♥. Invitational with 6♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOL Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 3♥. Invitational with 6♥. yep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkDean Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 I think this is a tough hand. It feels to good for 2♥, but not enough for 3♥. I think it depends on our agreements, if 1♠ denied a balanced hand, sure sounds like heart shortness, and I would take the low road, otherwise I will bid 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 I would wish to be playing xzy here, and be able to bid 2♣ and follow it up with 2♥. Lacking that, then I am forced to bid 3♥'s, which isn't so bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 I see this problem over and over on BBF. It is always one solved with jump shift options. For me, I like 1♣-P-2♥ with this hand. Roughly a good weak two (8+ to 11-) with six hearts. If 1♣-P-2♥ is weak, then 1♣-P-1♥-P-1♠-P-2♥ should show the same thing (and, hence, 1♥...3♥ GF). Solves a world of hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 The fillers in pard's suit make the 3♥ bid a bit of an UNDERbid :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.