Jump to content

Yes, it's time for a new poll


Lobowolf

Do you believe that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe?  

55 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you believe that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe?

    • Yes
      47
    • No
      8


Recommended Posts

Sorry...intentionally didn't leave a maybe or a probably or anything like that. But do feel free to post and elaborate.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think there is.

 

There are millions of solar systems/planets extremely similar to Earth, and I think that there is an extremely high chance that one of these are inhabited... Maybe not by Intelligent life forms, but we have to give it a few billion years. Even other moons in our solar system have been shown to have ice or water on them. Also, not only are there planets with ice and water on them, but they are at a relatively safe distance from the star in their solar system, and could, if the conditions were right, support life. I don't see any way to really explore this in the near future, but hopefully in my lifetime we'll make some progress on this. After all, what evidence do we have to prove the contrary? and NO I don't believe all the "alien" sightings.

 

P.S. I am willing to bet that this will turn into a 30 page discussion about evolution AGAIN :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have voted "don't know". Since I estimate the probability to be 53.754% I votes "yes".

 

I doubt that we will ever get in contact with them, though. But it wouldn't surprise me if evidence of atmospheric free oxygen on an exoplanet was found within my lifetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a logical question for the unavoidable next poll : Could "they" better play bridge than us if they would know this game? :(

Bases on Jeff Rubin's "Bridge on the Moon" I would say no. The bidding systems described in that story are truly lunatic. Maybe their card play is great, I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a logical question for the unavoidable next poll : Could "they" better play bridge than us if they would know this game? :D

Bases on Jeff Rubin's "Bridge on the Moon" I would say no. The bidding systems described in that story are truly lunatic. Maybe their card play is great, I don't know.

Sure, but we dont know anything about Alpha Centauri Precision and how to defend it in the possible first Galaxy Bowl :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange to see any "no" answers.

 

A man of science would think, IMO, that the odds are so high that "belief" is probably not too strong a word.

 

A religious man would have to include their deity as "intelligent," I would hope.

 

The only person to vote "no" would have to be a strict scientist, who cannot "believe" something without proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Intelligent' life on our planet has been around for less than a million years. 1/14000th the length of time the universe has been around. How many countless civlisations could have risen and fallen even in our own star system before we came along and we would have missed them.

 

And space is so big that you have to think in logarithmic scale to appreciate how far away things are... linear thinking doesn't quite cut it. There could be intelligent life on every second earth like rock around every star and we wouldn't have a clue they are there. We can't even see extra-solar planets the size of earth yet (maybe soon).

 

Then again, whatever initially started out organic life could have been statistical fluke, unlikely to be replicated no matter how many planets and stars are in the universe, and the only thing we can do in the search for intelligent life as we don't know it is to define what 'life' means and what it means to be 'intelligent'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find the results of this thread to be interesting in conjunction with the Noah's Ark thread, with respect to the burden of proof being on the side ascribing to an affirmative belief and the posts focused on holding to beliefs unsupported by evidence.

 

Is the support for the belief generally, "Well, it's a REALLY big place that's been around a REALLY long time, so it seems like there should be," or something else? If the former, does that constitute evidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the support for the belief generally, "Well, it's a REALLY big place that's been around a REALLY long time, so it seems like there should be," or something else? If the former, does that constitute evidence?

In my case, that is partly what it is. I also recall hearing statistics that there are something like tens of thousands of planets in existence that are capable of supporting life as we know it (with god knows how many more capable of supporting life as we don't know it.)

 

I think the difference between this and Noah's Ark is that if any good or even fair evidence were found in either direction, it would be VERY easy to change peoples' minds on this issue. I consider my opinion on this matter essentially a guess. I'll be the first to admit I have no good evidence in either direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find the results of this thread to be interesting in conjunction with the Noah's Ark thread, with respect to the burden of proof being on the side ascribing to an affirmative belief and the posts focused on holding to beliefs unsupported by evidence.

 

Is the support for the belief generally, "Well, it's a REALLY big place that's been around a REALLY long time, so it seems like there should be," or something else? If the former, does that constitute evidence?

It's an estimate of the most likely situation based on the information we have. It does not rely upon gods or magic.

 

The Noah's ark story is most implausible based on the information we have. It does rely upon gods and magic.

 

For most of us, either opinion would change based upon strong evidence the other way. For some of us, the evidence does not matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(with god knows how many more capable of supporting life as we don't know it.)

God?

Luckily it's only a figure of speech :lol:

I wouldn't worry about it. While often having interesting points to make, I think it's been months at least since Tim made a post about the topic at hand, rather than some nitpicky distraction about something minor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...