mtvesuvius Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 1. 1♦ - (3♣) - 4♣ 2. 1♦ - (3♣) - 4♦ What should they be? Maybe 4♦ as minorwood? Any ideas/thoughts/comments are welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Both support bids, strong/weak resp. Although it might make sense to use the 1st auction as 55 majos or somefink. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 I think it would make a lot of sense that one of them is a form of keycard, since if you want to bid 4♣ then keycard partner might get in the way and bid 5♦. At the table I would interpret the 4♦ bid as not quite forcing, but very distributional and shapely and rarely passed. But it's not something I've thought about before. Good question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOL Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 1. 1♦ - (3♣) - 4♣ 2. 1♦ - (3♣) - 4♦ What should they be? Maybe 4♦ as minorwood? Any ideas/thoughts/comments are welcome. Nice question Adam, never thought about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 Both support bids, strong/weak resp. <snip> Agree. With kind regardsMarlowe PS: We dont play Minorwood in unconstested auctions,hence we wont play it in contested ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.