Jump to content

dummy didn't support


hanp

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=w&v=e&e=skqjhj8dq10xxxxcaj&s=saxxxxhqxxdckxxxx]266|200|Scoring: IMP

1D - p - 2C* - p

2NT - p - 3NT - all pass[/hv]

 

2C showed a balanced hand or clubs, 2NT showed 12-14 balanced.

 

Partner leads the heart 10, showing 0 or 2 higher honors. Declarer thinks for a bit and plays the jack. You cover and after some thought declarer plays low.

 

How do you continue the defense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks like a classic right out of one of the old books on defensive play. Return a low club. If partner has 3 clubs and declarer has to lose the lead twice, you have 6 tricks.

 

If partner has Qxxx or QTx of clubs, all the better. But depending on how the play goes, you may not have the luxury of playing partner for QTx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

low club.

 

appears opener has xxx(x), AKx, AJxx, xx(x)

With this hand, why didn`t he win the first heart, play a spade and play on diamonds? He will win when the diamond finesse is on or hearts are 4-4 or when the defence continus hearts but the one with the 5. heart does not hold the king of diamonds.

He has one stopper in club but two in hearts, ducking the first trick could be very wrong.

 

 

But I would lead a club too.

Even when partner lead from AKT9x, we will still beat the contract later. They have at most 6 diamonds and two clubs before we regain the lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Return highest

 

If declarer plays you win and return

If declarer plays you must suggest switch as laudly as you can :) Also pard should realize that only way to beat contract is with switch,success guarantted with partner having xx T9xxx Kxx Qxx

 

Problem with playing small immediately is that with Txx in clubs declarer will survive 2+2+5

 

 

Hate me :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

appears opener has xxx(x), AKx, AJxx, xx(x)

With this hand, why didn`t he win the first heart, play a spade and play on diamonds? He will win when the diamond finesse is on or hearts are 4-4 or when the defence continus hearts but the one with the 5. heart does not hold the king of diamonds.

He has one stopper in club but two in hearts, ducking the first trick could be very wrong.

Because he is waiting for you to swtch to holding Txx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had this hand at the table yesterday. I still think there is a clearly "right" answer but it hasn't been mentioned yet so perhaps I need to think about it again. Later.

I haven't thought through this carefully enough yet, but I can construct hands where any suit is right, including a spade...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Declarer holds the AK and one of the diamond honors (otherwise the hand is hopeless). We don't know about the club queen (AK-A is an opening bid for most people). Some information about declarer's diamond length would be useful, as would if declarer has denied a four card major.

 

It seems declarer will be able to take 5 diamonds, 2 spades, 1 club and 1 heart in due course.

 

So, it's either a heart or a club. A heart works if declarer tries to knock out the spade first, but I'm afraid that declarer will lay down the A first getting the news and then knock out the spade.

 

A club works if partner has the QTx, however, 9xx in declarer's hand creates a blockage, if declarer figures out to knock out the A first. There's even a blockage when pard has QT9. In the end we probably need four clubs in pard's hand.

 

So I'm continuing a heart. I don't see a reason not to continue with the low one. It may talk declarer into knocking out the spade first, if he thinks I have the entry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems declarer will be able to take 5 diamonds, 2 spades, 1 club and 1 heart in due course. 

 

So, it's either a heart or a club. A heart works if declarer tries to knock out the spade first, but I'm afraid that declarer will lay down the A first getting the news and then knock out the spade.

 

A club works if partner has the QTx, however, 9xx in declarer's hand creates a blockage, if declarer figures out to knock out the A first. There's even a blockage when pard has QT9. In the end we probably need four clubs in pard's hand.

 

So I'm continuing a heart. I don't see a reason not to continue with the low one. It may talk declarer into knocking out the spade first, if he thinks I have the entry.

2 hearts you mean.

 

I doun't see what problem arises for defenders if he plays A- south returns and defence takes 3+1+1

 

There is no blockage with pard having QTx

If he tries to knock out A duck first , and take next one followed by return.. this would be great for defenders as they will get 1+1+3+2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doun't see what problem arises for defenders if he plays A- south returns and defence takes 3+1+1

I misspoke. Once declarer sees partner's entry, that will be the suit he attacks. So upon the A, the K gets knocked out and thats it.

 

There is no blockage with pard having QTx

 

Look again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doun't see what problem arises for defenders if he plays A- south returns and defence takes  3+1+1

I misspoke. Once declarer sees partner's entry, that will be the suit he attacks. So upon the A, the K gets knocked out and thats it.

 

There is no blockage with pard having QTx

 

Look again.

After K partner having Qxx retuns and we get 2+1+1+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the joint effort nailed it. It seems best to continue with a low heart. If declarer wins and is careless enough to play a spade you can knock out the last heart and partner will beat it when he gets in with a diamond. If declarer plays diamond first you have to pitch your other heart. Partner will know you falsecarded (you would not pitch your heart with Kx left) and sees there is no future in hearts. In this case there you still beat it if partner has Qxx of clubs.

 

At the table declarer had 10xx AKx AJxx Q10x.

 

This looks like a classic right out of one of the old books on defensive play.

 

That's what Kevin Fay said too when I gave him the hand yesterday, he thought the hand appeared in Killing Defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...