TimG Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 (1♠)-DBL-(Pass)-2♠(DBL)-Pass-(Pass)-3♣ No special agreements. Is this non-forcing? Forcing one round? Game forcing? One line answers perfectly acceptable! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricK Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 You are forced as far as you were by the cue-bid. In practice, it is hard to see this stopping short of game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 I play a cue as a GF by an unpassed hand. I thought this was standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 I have always considered it standard that the cuebid response to a takeout double is forcing to suit agreement. In other words, forcing until game is reached or someone raises someone. That's why the only hands that are less than game forcing that cuebid tend to be 4-4 in the majors invitational strength in response to a takeout double of a minor. So the 3♣ bid is forcing, but 4♣ by the doubler is not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts