Jump to content

"Experts" disagreed...


awm

What's your call? And is it a problem?  

58 members have voted

  1. 1. What's your call? And is it a problem?

    • Pass
      13
    • 3S
      28
    • 3N
      1
    • 4C
      3
    • 4D
      1
    • 4H
      12


Recommended Posts

You hold:

 

xx

Q

AT9xx

AT98x

 

After two passes, your LHO opens 2. Partner overcalls 3 and RHO passes. What is your call?

 

Is this even a problem? When I held this hand at the table, one of my expert opponents indicated that he thought this was a "WTP" hand, and that it was "obvious" to make a particular call. The call he wanted to make was my fourth choice on the list of six calls in the poll.... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Given partner is a passed hand I let this one go.  If partner were an unpassed hand I would raise to 4.

Perhaps I wasn't clear. YOU are a passed hand, partner is not. The auction is:

 

Pass - Pass - 2 - 3

Pass - ????

 

If you routinely open ten-counts with stiff queens just because they're five-five in the minors, sorry. Pretend you had to sub for me after my ridiculous second-seat pass. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised that an expert could call it a "wtp". No expert myself but am sure there will be votes for everything, maybe except for 4.

 

Maybe stupid question, but why the rush to bid 4? Suppose we bid 3, then we may or may not sit for p's 3NT, but wouldn't it be nice if he bids 4m over our 3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a problem hand like this should have vulnerability and scoring format. Vulnerable at IMPs I think 4 is clear; I am not sure what I will do at MP (pass is now an option), or non-vul at IMPs.

 

In the latter instance I would likely also raise to 4, first of all because it's unlikely that we will have exactly 9 tricks available.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm strangely attracted to 3, leaving 3NT in the picture opposite AQx AKJxxx xx xx at MPs. This is by no means a wtp, and I'm torn between 3 and 4, however 5m may play better than 4, if partner rebids 4m I can raise to 5, otherwise bid 4. Also, MPs or IMPs and Vul. really make a difference here, pass may even be valid at MPs. Edited by mtvesuvius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nice to have discussed 3 doesn't promise support here, and anything else that stems from that agreement. If you are assuring me 3 promises heart support then I bid 4. I will try to leave any of the three suits other than spades in the picture.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nice to have discussed 3 doesn't promise support here, and anything else that stems from that agreement. If you are assuring me 3 promises heart support then I bid 4. I will try to leave any of the three suits other than spades in the picture.

True... 3 doesn't promise support IMO. It's like a LTT3NT type of bid also, essentially a Western Cuebid. So partner would show a spade stopper or a side 4 card minor, which is why I like 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given partner is a passed hand I let this one go.  If partner were an unpassed hand I would raise to 4.

Perhaps I wasn't clear. YOU are a passed hand, partner is not. The auction is:

 

Pass - Pass - 2 - 3

Pass - ????

 

If you routinely open ten-counts with stiff queens just because they're five-five in the minors, sorry. Pretend you had to sub for me after my ridiculous second-seat pass. :)

Nope. I don't. Maybe playing a strong club, but not part of the problem. I will go with my 2nd selection then of bidding 4. Glad I had covered my bases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are assuring me 3 promises heart support then I bid 4. I will try to leave any of the three suits other than spades in the picture.

Come to think of it a little deeper, I agree with jdonn. I like 4 better than 4.

 

- 1. Partner could have 5 hearts and 4+ clubs.

- 2. Partner could have 5 hearts and 4+ diamonds.

- 3. If he rebids hearts, I am happy too.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why no vulnerability info?

 

Why no double as an option... does everyone play it as penalty (I don't).

 

If partner passes my double, then I rate to be happy what with my two aces, and stiff in partner's suit.

 

if he bids 4, again I rate to be happy

 

if he bids 3N, I will be delighted.. 6 hearts, a spade and 2 aces make for none easy tricks, and he will hold more than that

 

If he bids 4minor... well, I am not going to be really happy with that, but I can always prefer back to 4 and he will at least have a chance of going right if we belong in 5 minor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nor I, but the back pain meds might help :) I guess I saw someone's 3 bid and that morphed into thinking that rho had raised. Oh well.. the good news is that BBO software would have protected me from revealing my idiocy if I were playing online
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know which game we belong in. We have a bid available that says "I don't know which game we belong in". It does seem rather obvious.

I am also a 3 bidder and wonder if some of the other answers possibly are from those who've missread the auction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4H for me. The Q of H is a nice card.

Can't bid a minor - fit jump.

Also I think 3S would be interpreted as a max pass with H support.

I get great joy out of the karma of someone being forced to raise on a singleton because a new suit would show a fit. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...