shevek Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 [hv=d=n&v=b&n=saj943haj6d87ck87&w=sk865h743d4cqjt54&e=st2hk52dkqjt963c9&s=sq7hqt98da52ca632]399|300|Scoring: IMP1♠ - (3♦) - presumably double.Then ...[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOL Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 X 3H 4H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtfanclub Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 X 3H 4H Not X 3H 3S followed by game in a major? Sorry, this stuff confuses me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggieb Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 I had a partner who always passed hands like north's--balanced, no fit, and reasonable defense. I never really became convinced, but it works out fine here, and over the times I played with him, it might have generated more IMPs than lost (and on a hand where East is a solid citizen!). Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOL Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 I had a partner who always passed hands like north's--balanced, no fit, and reasonable defense. I never really became convinced, but it works out fine here, and over the times I played with him, it might have generated more IMPs than lost (and on a hand where East is a solid citizen!). Thoughts? I do this at MP but not imps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 I had a partner who always passed hands like north's--balanced, no fit, and reasonable defense. I never really became convinced, but it works out fine here, and over the times I played with him, it might have generated more IMPs than lost (and on a hand where East is a solid citizen!). Thoughts? I had a partner like that too, which I told him I didn't like but I would try it. Every time he did it it worked, every time I did it it didn't work. So we were both right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmunte1 Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 X 3H 4H I would have bid this way too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 If you're going to play in game, do you actually want to reach four of a major? OK, I can see that on the actual layout 3NT is going to go three down, but I don't think I'd make 4H or 4S either - in either case I'd end up losing to ♠10 at the wrong moment. In 3NT I expect to make if both major suit kings are onside - West's hand will be mangled by having to discard twice on diamonds - whereas bad breaks may still scupper four of a major. When someone's preempted, I tend to avoid 7-card fits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOL Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 I think you will make 4H a large majority of the time that both major suit kings are on plus a fair amount that only one king is on. It seems a lot better to me. But yeah 3D X is the spot single dummy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.