Jump to content

Who gets the lemon?


Echognome

Recommended Posts

Of course both things are not the same and I am exagerating, but so was josh when he said 2 would be completelly artificial (its the kind of game we use to play here :D)

No I wasn't. It does not show extra spade length at all. That means it is artificial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I said that 2 not showing 3 card support for partner's suit is artificial would you take me as crazy? :)

 

My point is: Anything that differs from your standard aproach is artificial for you, but doesn't have to be for others.

2 showing 2+ is natural because it shows heart length that you haven't shown yet.

2 showing a balanced hand without three hearts is artificial because it says something completely unrelated to your spade length.

 

Why am I even having this discussion? You seem to think "natural" means "standard", and "artificial" means "not standard". That is of course ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah its ridicoulous, but now you say it, we should be advised of treatments that are not standard, not aritificial.

 

2 shows spades its natural (confirms 4 and not 3 lol), it is just common logic that lets us know that it must be 4324 since nothing else is possible.

 

Oh now I see it, it also implieaes 12-14 wich is the main problem for most people in this thread.

 

Anyway none of my arguments will convince you, so ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 shows spades its natural (confirms 4 and not 3 lol)

Agree with lol. ;)

 

Oh now I see it, it also implieaes 12-14 wich is the main problem for most people in this thread.

THAT is the main problem for most people in this thread? Where do you get this stuff?

 

Anyway none of my arguments will convince you, so ok.

I don't even know what you are arguing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think South showed three card support with 2H. If that *is* the agreement that it shows 3-card support, then North has to share some of the blame when South never heard North has five hearts. If that is not the agreement, could someone construct a viable hand in the bidding where South only has two card hearts?

 

Still, 3NT instead of 3H by South was a mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hum.. was 2 GAME forcing?

Yes!

Then what's wrong with North bidding 3 after 2? 3 doesn't help clarifying his intentions.

I believe I addressed this already.

 

The way I play South could had bid 2 if he had only 2 hearts. 2 shows 100% 3 cards, that would transfer blame to north.

Even if that's true then 3 is completely normal. It's a possible slam hand, and I like playing slams in 5-4 and 5-5 fits better than in 5-3 fits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...