Jump to content

What does partner want?


Gerben42

Recommended Posts

Partner suggests add. defence, at least 1 def. trick,

he asks you, how you view the prospects defeating 4S.

 

If you have 0 tricks, you should bid 5H, with prospects of

making 2 tricks you should pass.

=> With your given hand: Pass.

 

The Alternative is, that he completly denies any def. trick,

and just showes a 5H preemptive opening, in which case

you would need a prospect of making at least 3 tricks.

=> With your given hand: Pass.

 

It is wonderfull to have a hand, which does not care about

the actual meaning.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Alternative is, that he completly denies any def. trick,

and just showes a 5H preemptive opening, in which case

you would need a prospect of making at least 3 tricks.

=> With your given hand: Pass.

 

If you then make your 3 tricks, you would write -590. Opponents usually insist that they made their contract unless you take FOUR tricks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the answer depends on methods, and then on agreements.

 

One school of thought has been that the double shows an unexpectedly strong preempt.. with better defence than you would expect.. and invites you to decide whether to pass or bid.. opener expecting that either decision will, if chosen correctly, be better than defending 4 x'd.. so I'd expect, on this view, very good hearts, and a trick or two outsise.. he was bidding 4 primarily to make, rather than as a preemptive strike.

 

Our hand suggests that he doesn't have that hand.

 

The other school of thought is as jlol suggests... he has a super-preempt, suitable for a 5-level save, but since your defensive prospects are unknown, he doesn't want to save unilaterally, and he is involving you.

 

I prefer the 2nd, but I'd be nervous as opener doing this undiscussed. At the table, as responder, I pull because if he has the first hand, we should make, and if he has the second hand, we have a good save or even a make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the answer depends on methods, and then on agreements.

 

One school of thought has been that the double shows an unexpectedly strong preempt.. with better defence than you would expect.. and invites you to decide whether to pass or bid.. opener expecting that either decision will, if chosen correctly, be better than defending 4 x'd.. so I'd expect, on this view, very good hearts, and a trick or two outsise.. he was bidding 4 primarily to make, rather than as a preemptive strike.

 

Our hand suggests that he doesn't have that hand.

 

The other school of thought is as jlol suggests... he has a super-preempt, suitable for a 5-level save, but since your defensive prospects are unknown, he doesn't want to save unilaterally, and he is involving you.

 

I prefer the 2nd, but I'd be nervous as opener doing this undiscussed. At the table, as responder, I pull because if he has the first hand, we should make, and if he has the second hand, we have a good save or even a make.

I play the first way when the opening was in 3rd or 4th seat, or it was an overcall. And the way that says you want to bid one more when the opening was in 1st or 2nd seat. To me that seems pretty normal? I won't want to open a stronger hand at the 4 level in one of the first two seats, but in the last two seats or as an overcall I may easily want to since slam chances become quite slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer the 2nd, but I'd be nervous as opener doing this undiscussed.

 

You want to do the 1st undiscussed? Not me :rolleyes:

no.. I would be nervous doubling, undiscussed, because I would be guessing which way partner would take it.. on the actual hand, I think that I'd get away with it because I think responder has a 5 call on either view. But that wouldn't stop me being nervous, until I saw dummy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with JLOL here. This is cooperative, giving partner an option to pass with 5 or lots of defense, after all they might have guessed wrong, and isn't the whole point of pre-empts to make your opponents guess wrong? I bid 5. 3rd/4th seat I pass because as Mike said, now X shows extra values.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...