Jump to content

Do you balance?


Benoit35

Recommended Posts

Pass. Partner has probably psyched, but it's possible that LHO has 13, P has 14, we have 7 and RHO has AQTxxx or something... Otherwise partner must have psyched. Therefore, I pass, I've already XXed, if partner cannot X, then I certainly cannot...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think opps are messing it up. Why would LHO first run from 1NTxx and then bid 3NT? Either he thinks 3 shows extras, or his 3NT is meant as running away from a worse 3 contract. Yeah I know I have played too much in weak fields, I guess against good opps I would have to conclude that p has psyched.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Partners thoughts:

I showed my 16-18 HCPs with my 1 NT bid, but maybe pd psyched his Xx, or he thought that this is part of our runout cheme and I must bid 2 Clubs. So I better pass now. He is in the pass out seat, so he surely will bid when he has his promised values. I have my bid, no need to double 3 NT.

 

But unluckily, pd passes and a golden opportunity is missed. Opener opened with KTxxx, Qxx,AQxxx,V and responder double with xx,xx, xxx,AKTxxx.

 

Quite unlucky that they are allowed to play it undoubled.

 

I sat opposite a 1 NT psych once, doubled and redoubled. They reached 6 NT, so even I saw that pd psyched. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll post the full board later today, but here are some follow-up questions (full spoiler alert):

 

#1:

West passes and NS makes 12 tricks. At the other tables, 6NT was bid and made 90% of the time. Turns out, East - OK, if you insist, I - psyched the 1NT overcall with nothing but the King of clubs. If you're the tournament director, what do you think about West's handling of the situation? (By the way, 3NTx+3 = 850, still less than 6NT = 990.)

 

 

#2:

West was a "beginner", but a competent one. He was completely oblivious of the psych. Does this affect your ruling?

 

 

#3:

South had 18 hcp (AQ in all three lower suits), yet failed to explore slam, let alone make a forcing bid. Does this affect your ruling?

 

 

Last thoughts:

This board, playing pick-up bridge on BBO, made me realize that psyching could put a B/I partner in an ethical fix of which he might not be aware, and thus put him under suspicion when his bidding was simply a result of his lack of experience. He passed because he was a beginner, but I thought a more advanced player's pass would look an awful lot like fielding a psych.

 

Fortunately in this case, it seems the opposition didn't even notice the psych - ever! We moved on to the next board and the next and the next, deafening silence blaring from the chat box... :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll post the full board later today, but here are some follow-up questions (full spoiler alert):

 

#1:

West has passed and NS makes 12 tricks.  6NT was bid and made 90% of the time.  Turns out, East - OK, if you insist, I - psyched the 1NT overcall with nothing but the King of spades.  If you're the tournament director, what do you think about West's handling of the situation?  (By the way, 3NTx+3 = 850, still less than 6NT = 990.)

 

 

#2:

West was a "beginner", but a competent one.  He was completely oblivious of the psych.  Does this affect your ruling?

 

 

#3:

South had 18 hcp (AQ in all three lower suits), yet failed to explore slam, let alone make a forcing bid.  Does this affect your ruling?

 

 

Last thoughts:

This board, playing pick-up bridge on BBO, made me realize that psyching could put a B/I partner in an ethical fix of which he might not be aware.  He passed because he was a beginner, but I think a more advanced player's pass would look an awful lot like fielding a psych.

My Response (Hidden b/c of spoilers)

 

 

1. The bidding has revealed to West that partner has psyched, this is LEGAL information assumed from the bidding. I would let the result stand. If the director truely feels it's nessesary, he can adjust to 3NT X +3 for 850... A striped ape X :D

 

2. No. West made a decision, maybe a bad one, but a decision.

 

3. I don't think so... I let the result stand, south also bad a bad decision, but it was blatantly obvious that East had psyched.

 

4. This is true, but a player cannot ignore inferences on the table during the bidding.

 

My Ruling: Result Stands. South should have known that it was a psych, West can know that it's a psych b/c he can count to 40. East has the right to psych, and in fact it was a good one.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does partner always psyche a vulnerable 1N at red with no escape suit? This is the bridge equivalent of the movie Crank. Looking at my hand, a psyche is possible, but partner has some sort of runout, but that seems impossible.

 

I would have doubled 3N. I think the opponents have had a serious train wreck. If I don't double here is there ever a hand that I would double on?

 

I also think pard might have misread my xx. If we play systems on after a 1N overcall, xx might be a runout. I can't tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have doubled 3N. I think the opponents have had a serious train wreck. If I don't double here is there ever a hand that I would double on?

I wonder the opposite question. If you double on this, is there a (strength showing) redouble you WOULDN'T double on??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does partner always psyche a vulnerable 1N at red with no escape suit?

LOL, if that were the case it wouldn't be a psyche would it? (This was white btw.)

 

Looking at things with the West cards, I see three possibilities:

 

(1) NS have messed up and reached an impossible 3NT (having at most 18 hcp between them) - gotta double.

(2) North has some freak distribution which will allow him to make 3NT and/or my unknown partner has made a light (say 12-14) overcall, in which case I'm looking at a bad score - a 4 sac might be a tempting option there.

(3) Partner has psyched, and we should pass.

 

Are we allowed to consider (3) possibility, or is "fielding a psyche" forbidden unless we have 100% evidence from the bidding?

 

There are not 60 HCP in the deck.

LOL no, only 50! (NS have 26 cause they bid game, and EW have 22-24.) ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

;) :rolleyes: I don't want to be rude, but this is such and easy decision.

 

Either your xx was runout..but with clearly with your hand it is not. So if xx is for business and PD can't X 3NT clearly he has psyched so PASS and be happy that your minus score won't be 4 digits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have doubled 3N. I think the opponents have had a serious train wreck. If I don't double here is there ever a hand that I would double on?

I wonder the opposite question. If you double on this, is there a (strength showing) redouble you WOULDN'T double on??

Sure, if I thought partner absolutely thought the xx was values (the OP is silent on this, but it can be inferred looking at all the hands obv), then doubling 3N is pretty stupid.

 

I guess it comes down to the chances of pard misinterpreting the xx versus pard making a very strange psyche. Both are remote, but I haven't seen a vulnerable psyche like this. Never. The upside of this psyche is so dubious, unless you are playing against total retards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would let the result stand. But I would be very disappointed in you. Psyches against beginners, no matter how bright, seems unethical to me. I am certain others would consider it "sharp bridge"... sort of the Bridge World idea to do whatever is allowed by the rules of the game to increase your chance of winning. Now if you didn't have a clue about your oppnents skil level, then of course psyches are fine.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would let the result stand. But I would be very disappointed in you. Psyches against beginners, no matter how bright, seems unethical to me. I am certain others would consider it "sharp bridge"... sort of the Bridge World idea to do whatever is allowed by the rules of the game to increase your chance of winning. Now if you didn't have a clue about your oppnents skil level, then of course psyches are fine.

If you psyche in my club against a beginner, you will be a pariah for awhile. It's just bad form.

 

Do it all you want against experienced players (by the way the experienced players around here still couldn't fish out a psyche if it climbed up their arm), and I won't say anything, except, "nice bid sir".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if partner does not think XX showed values then Xing this is not too bright, I am repeating myself but the opps have bid 3N! They opened, they doubled 1N, and then they got to 3N. Why do you think they are doing this if they have 18 HCP? Even if they have just gone completely insane and forgotten that you would like more than half the deck to play 3N, you are already doing great anyways and aren't gaining much with a double. More likely the opps know what they have in their hands.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...