Jump to content

Balancing at Matchpoints 2


Recommended Posts

Sorry, I guess that largely answers my question.

 

Last week, I passed out the opponents balance (weak field?), and it got me a 0. I *think* I was short in their suit, though I may have had an extra bit of length in our suit - can't recall.

 

Twice at the club yesterday, the balance was IMMEDIATELY bid over, raising to 3 of the agreed suit. I was starting to wonder if this was automatic or semi-automatic.

 

I'll try again, though. Is this more or less a LOTT question? For example, what would you do with?

 

1 P 2 P

P 3 P P

?

 

xxxxx

x

xxx

xxx

 

Clear pass because partner has 3 spades (didn't LOTT and bid 3) and decent hearts (implied), or clear 3 in case 3 makes. (Does vuln matter?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this more or less a LOTT question?  For example, what would you do with?

 

1 P 2 P

P 3 P P

?

 

xxxxx

x

xxx

xxx

 

Clear pass because partner has 3 spades (didn't LOTT and bid 3) and decent hearts (implied), or clear 3 in case 3 makes.  (Does vuln matter?)

Yes it is. I think I would pass, unless I have extras or good spots.

 

Edit: At MPs, vul. does matter, NV I think 3 is a long term winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside the B/I section, there are many reasons why you should or should not compete with 3 over 3.

 

But here, I would simplify it to: Follow the law. When you have an extra trump, bid one more.

This is not the best rule, but easy to follow and works quite well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably your chance of a bad board has increased by virtue of the fact that 3 was bid, regardless of what you do now. If most people were allowed to play 2 for +110, for instance, if your options are +100 against 3 or -100 in 3, you're in trouble.

 

The extra trump is a useful yardstick - it both helps on offense, and hurts on defense (increasing the chances that a potential spade winner will get ruffed). Also, the partner with the long hearts is usually better placed to make the decision - if those hearts are, say, 9xxx that argues somewhat for bidding on, as the hand is better offensively on splinter principles; if the hearts are KJxx, the hand is better defensively. This distinction is somewhat undercut, though, in that the balance doesn't guarantee a fit; it would be more useful in an auction where both sides' fits were disclosed. You might compete with 9xxx and then find out that the opponents were at the 3-level with a 6- or 7-card fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bidding:

1 P 2 P

P 3 ?

 

or

 

1 P 2 P

P 3 P P

?

 

When do you compete to 3? Pretty much always?

In IMPs, I almost never bid 3 as opener. I may lose an IMP or three, but not more than that.

 

Part of the reason is because if I thought we had any shot at 4, I wouldn't have passed 2 the first time. So the hand is probably fairly marginal.

 

If we do have a 9 card fit, their most likely fit isn't 9 cards, it's 8. So bidding on as opener is dangerous.

 

As responder, if I have the extra spade and I would have accepted an invite, I'll bid 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're never good enough not to balance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...