Lobowolf Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 ♠Txx♥ATxx♦AKTxx♣A Opponents silent at matchpoints...Anyone have a preferred alternative to a 15-point reverse after 1♦-1♠? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 This looks like a 2♠ raise to me. If partner needs to know, partner can raise ask with 2NT, I will bid 3♦ (Maximum with 3♠). Otherwise, I have described my hand. I don't think this is worth a reverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xcurt Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Slow roll with 2♠. If I reverse, my next call will be 3♠ which guarantees we reach game and also precludes 3NT when partner has moderate clubs. 2♠ keeps in play * doubling the opponents if they come in* 3NT* diamond contract* spade partial -- and there's no reason to assume that we're making a game yet Someone will surely point out that this is another win for 1m-1M; 2♣ artificial handing many death hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 I understand raising 1s to 2s.....I also understand if pard opens 1nt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 two spades Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 2♠ but can live with a 1N opening. Reversing is out of the question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 I'll reverse. I don't think I've ever reversed with a 4-5 15 count, but A A AK T T T and three card support for partner, what can I say? I think it's too easy for 2♠ to miss game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Easy reverse. I reverse with 15 on a regular basis for systemic reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Agree with Josh. 2 Spade looks like Txx, Axxx,Akxxx,x f.e. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Agree with Josh. 2 Spade looks like Txx, Axxx,Akxxx,x f.e. Are you saying that would be a minimum 2♠ bid? If so, I don't see why adding a singleton ace and two tens makes it into more than a maximum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Aces, Kings and Tens also get me. I will also reverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Agree with Josh. 2 Spade looks like Txx, Axxx,Akxxx,x f.e. Are you saying that would be a minimum 2♠ bid? If so, I don't see why adding a singleton ace and two tens makes it into more than a maximum. Nice point. But as a 2 Spade response normally is around 11-15 HCPS, an Ace difference could be enough to make a stronger bid. And no, A,AK and a stiff are not minimum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Agree with Josh. 2 Spade looks like Txx, Axxx,Akxxx,x f.e. Are you saying that would be a minimum 2♠ bid? If so, I don't see why adding a singleton ace and two tens makes it into more than a maximum. For clarification, and I bet you would have guessed this, I would bid 2♠ with Txx ATxx AQTxx A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xcurt Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Agree with Josh. 2 Spade looks like Txx, Axxx,Akxxx,x f.e. Are you saying that would be a minimum 2♠ bid? If so, I don't see why adding a singleton ace and two tens makes it into more than a maximum. For clarification, and I bet you would have guessed this, I would bid 2♠ with Txx ATxx AQTxx A. Josh, why is the playing strength of this hand so much less?* Even if partner has a doubleton diamond the difference in value between ♦AKT and ♦AQT is very small since we probably need to attack diamonds anyway if we hope to make 10 tricks. I'd say that on hands where partner is passing a raise to 2♠, we are less than a 50% favorite to make a game. And if partner has good spades and little else, 2♠ should be our highest scoring partscore. And if partner has bad spades and a little else, at least we protected our plus. The danger hand for a raise to 2♠ is something like J8xxx, Kxx, Qxx, Kx which is probably 60-70% to make 4♠ and 3NT rolls unless diamonds fail to come in (and makes an overtrick in practice if diamonds and hearts play, and they misdefend or spades block). But if I reverse and partner has that hand, the auction is going to end in 4♠, not 3NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Josh, why is the playing strength of this hand so much less?I didn't say it was "so much less". It's simply where I have a cutoff. Everyone has a cutoff somewhere, which means there will be two hands on either side of it that differ by very little. Since I admit this is the very minimum I would reverse with (generally not with this shape and strength at all), then naturally a hand that's only a little worse would not be a reverse. I'd say that on hands where partner is passing a raise to 2♠, we are less than a 50% favorite to make a game.I agree. However I do not thinking missing a game (for example) 40% of the time is very good. Do you? And if partner has good spades and little else, 2♠ should be our highest scoring partscore.AKQxx xxx xx xxx is 'good spades and little else' I would say.And if partner has bad spades and a little else, at least we protected our plus. The danger hand for a raise to 2♠ is something like J8xxx, Kxx, Qxx, Kx which is probably 60-70% to make 4♠ and 3NT rolls unless diamonds fail to come in (and makes an overtrick in practice if diamonds and hearts play, and they misdefend or spades block). But if I reverse and partner has that hand, the auction is going to end in 4♠, not 3NT.I would always admit 2♥ (edited, I mistakently typed 2♠ before) can get us too high, just like you would always admit 2♠ can lead to a missed game. I don't feel the need to enumerate the cases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xcurt Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 I'd say that on hands where partner is passing a raise to 2♠, we are less than a 50% favorite to make a game.I agree. However I do not thinking missing a game (for example) 40% of the time is very good. Do you? If the alternative is stopping in a making partscore then yes. I'm claiming that if we reverse, we'll almost always reach game, so we should not reverse if it's a favorite to get us a minus score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 ♠Txx♥ATxx♦AKTxx♣A Opponents silent at matchpoints...Anyone have a preferred alternative to a 15-point reverse after 1♦-1♠? A 1NT opening.... Having opened 1♦, I'll raise to 2♠ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.