Jump to content

Simple question


Recommended Posts

1 1

1 ?

In basic Standard American bidding it is non-forcing.

 

In some agreements this sequence is taken as forcing. Time can change the definitions of any bid in any standard system - what was standard in 1950 may not be standard today.

 

My take: always check with pard if he or she considers it forcing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people choose to play this as forcing, but in standard bidding, it is not.

In general, after responder's 1-level response, opener's simple rebid, not a reverse or a jump, is not forcing.

 

So after (say) a 1D opening and a 1H response, all of

1S

1NT

2C and

2D

2H

 

are not forcing

 

After a 1D opening and a 1S response,

1NT, 2C, 2D and 2S are not forcing, but

2H is forcing, because it is a reverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jt youre an ass

Right, it's much more fun to post misleading questions in trying to win the post-mortem than it is to learn when rules do and don't apply.

 

Most people know the auction I posted isn't forcing. It's easier to remember a few nonforcing and forcing auctions as examples rather than try to memorize a rule that's a lot more complicated that it's set out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW regarding this talk of 0 counts, well sure you would pass with 0, but you can have more than that. It's not uncommon to pass with three spades and up to 6 or even 7 if you aren't well suited for 1NT or going back to partner's first suit. For example with Kxx Qxxxx xxxx x it would be very wise to pass. Where are you going on the hand if partner wasn't good enough to jump shift?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jt youre an ass

Right, it's much more fun to post misleading questions in trying to win the post-mortem than it is to learn when rules do and don't apply.

 

Most people know the auction I posted isn't forcing. It's easier to remember a few nonforcing and forcing auctions as examples rather than try to memorize a rule that's a lot more complicated that it's set out to be.

When in doubt, I always followed the rule that new suits by unpassed hands were 100% forcing. The rule served me pretty well too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jt youre an ass

Right, it's much more fun to post misleading questions in trying to win the post-mortem than it is to learn when rules do and don't apply.

 

Most people know the auction I posted isn't forcing. It's easier to remember a few nonforcing and forcing auctions as examples rather than try to memorize a rule that's a lot more complicated that it's set out to be.

When in doubt, I always followed the rule that new suits by unpassed hands were 100% forcing. The rule served me pretty well too.

Usually, but there are exceptions to any rule :blink:. However it is an excellent guideline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key is that opener should always either jumpshift or reverse with a game forcing hand (or if he has support bid game/splinter). If he fails to do that, he does not have a GF hand and thus his bid is NF.

 

Just keep in mind that if he bids a new suit and is not reversing or JSing he could still have up to 17 and some 18s, so his range is very wide. You should keep the auction open if you believe you can still have game.

 

There are certainly hands where you think game is not possible opposite a non JS and could pass, and as jdonn said they are not necessarily 0 counts. The hand he gave is typical, exactly 3 spades and no club support and a 5/6 count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forcing.

 

But basically a matter of partnership agreement.

 

The first question is, how often do you respond with less than

6HCP to an opening bid.

If you virtually never do, there is no point in playing 1S as

nonforcing, because you wont pass, if it occurrs more

frequently, than it makes more sense to play it as nonforcing.

 

I used to say, it is forcing, but my partner has passed at least

twice, and I seem to recall I started doing it as well, so I guess

I should change my answer to nonforcing.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first question is, how often do you respond with less than

6HCP to an opening bid.

If you virtually never do, there is no point in playing 1S as

nonforcing, because you wont pass, if it occurrs more

frequently, than it makes more sense to play it as nonforcing.

I am fine with playing 1 as forcing but you exaggerate. If 1 is forcing, responder will more often have to bid 1NT on hands with which he is not comfortable playing 1NT and certainly don't want opener to raise to 2NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my partnerships

1 1

1 can be up to 19 HPC.

When responder passes it's because 1 was subminimal (5 or less).

He must hold 3 spades and 4/5 hearts.

With 6 hearts he would have responded 2.

 

This sequence (pass 1) has occured several times and the result was always satisfying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...