Jump to content

Hypothesis Testing


awm

Your call over 3C preempt?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. Your call over 3C preempt?

    • Pass
      9
    • Double
      10
    • 3H
      27


Recommended Posts

Matchpoints, red vs. white. RHO opens 3 (natural, preempt). What is your plan holding:

xxx AKxxx Axxx Q

IMO _P = 10, _X = 9, 3H = 8

Even at pairs, I prefer sound immediate actions over pre-empts, especially at adverse vulneraboility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To clarify my position, although I agree that the short club hand should try to take action, I am also aware that my partner will assume a better hand than this for direct 3-level action and will put us in an unmakeable game way too frequently when he holds a 10-11 count.

 

If he has the hand to produce game opposite my hand, hopefully he won't sell out to 3C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the table, the person with this hand bid 3.

 

Partner held:

 

Qxx

Txx

KQxx

KTx

 

and found an unbelievable (to me anyway) pass. The 3 contract failed by a trick (losing a club, two spades, a spade ruff, and the trump queen) for -100 and a near-top.

 

Bidding 3 opposite a normal partner who goes to game on those cards gets you -200. Doubling gets you to 3NT which is also -200 if you cash out (worse if you don't). Passing was the true winner this time, netting a nice +50.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

passing 3 is unbelievable IMO.

I dont find pass that unbelievable. Flat hand no ruffing value, and probably wasted king of clubs. Partner may have streched to act with shortness. I would like to defend with this hand.

 

I might bid 3NT, at IMPS but would give some consideration at passing.

Thats why double would work better from partner, so you will have maybe easier time now;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

passing 3 is unbelievable IMO.

I dont find pass that unbelievable. Flat hand no ruffing value, and probably wasted king of clubs. Partner may have streched to act with shortness. I would like to defend with this hand.

 

I might bid 3NT, at IMPS but would give some consideration at passing.

Thats why double would work better from partner, so you will have maybe easier time now;)

Pass over 3 is auto for me. Bidding very conservative 3rd-level overcalls and then expecting pard to raise with hand like this is not winning bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Q is waste paper, but a stiff in opener's suit is fine. So I pretend I have xxx AKxxx Axxx x.

 

For me a two level overcall should be Rule of 20 with 2 quick tricks and a three level overcall should be a queen stronger. This hand is Rule of 20 with an extra quick trick and a proven stiff--these are at least equivalent to the needed queen.

 

Passing 3 on partner's hand seems automatic given these minimums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...