Jump to content

Just when you wish you hadn't seen it all


dburn

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=w&v=b&n=sq10732hq4da972c103&w=sk984haj532d43c95&e=s6hk876dj1086cqj42&s=saj5h109dkq5cak876]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

South opened 1NT after three passes and played in 4 on a transfer auction.

 

West led a club, and South played the first few tricks at a frantic pace: ace and king of clubs, club ruff (West pitching a diamond), spade to the jack and king. At this point West needed to shift to a heart to beat the contract, but he played his remaining diamond to the two, six and queen.

 

South cashed the ace of spades and, with immortality in his grasp despite (or perhaps because of) the way he had played until now, bizarrely led a club - a hopeless play that guaranteed not making the contract. All he had to do, though, was draw trumps in this position:

 

[hv=d=w&v=b&n=sq10732hq4da972c103&w=sk984haj532d43c95&e=s6hk876dj1086cqj42&s=saj5h109dkq5cak876]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

to execute a play I have never seen before - a stepping-stone winkle.

 

East must come down to the singleton K to avoid immediate loss, but South pitches a heart and leads a heart from the dummy. West cannot overtake, so East remains on play with K.

 

If East plays a high diamond, South wins the king and exits with a club; if East plays 8, South runs it to the nine, crosses to K, exits with a club and East must give the last trick to dummy.

 

There are times when, browbeaten by half the world who think that as a committee member I am not imposing enough regulation on systems and the other half who think I am imposing too much, while all of them think that I am acting solely in my own interests, I wonder why anyone plays this stupid game at all.

 

But then, thanks to Fred and to BBO, I can watch this gem of a hand live from China at half past two in the morning, and I know why I play bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=w&v=b&n=sq10732hq4da972c103&w=sk984haj532d43c95&e=s6hk876dj1086cqj42&s=saj5h109dkq5cak876]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

South opened 1NT after three passes and played in 4 on a transfer auction.

 

West led a club, and South played the first few tricks at a frantic pace: ace and king of clubs, club ruff (West pitching a diamond), spade to the jack and king. At this point West needed to shift to a heart to beat the contract, but he played his remaining diamond to the two, six and queen.

 

South cashed the ace of spades and, with immortality in his grasp despite (or perhaps because of) the way he had played until now, bizarrely led a club - a hopeless play that guaranteed not making the contract. All he had to do, though, was draw trumps in this position:

 

[hv=d=w&v=b&n=sq10732hq4da972c103&w=sk984haj532d43c95&e=s6hk876dj1086cqj42&s=saj5h109dkq5cak876]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

to execute a play I have never seen before - a stepping-stone winkle.

 

East must come down to the singleton K to avoid immediate loss, but South pitches a heart and leads a heart from the dummy. West cannot overtake, so East remains on play with K.

 

If East plays a high diamond, South wins the king and exits with a club; if East plays 8, South runs it to the nine, crosses to K, exits with a club and East must give the last trick to dummy.

 

There are times when, browbeaten by half the world who think that as a committee member I am not imposing enough regulation on systems and the other half who think I am imposing too much, while all of them think that I am acting solely in my own interests, I wonder why anyone plays this stupid game at all.

 

But then, thanks to Fred and to BBO, I can watch this gem of a hand live from China at half past two in the morning, and I know why I play bridge.

Your books also remind me why I love this game so much. (If you are david burn the author that is)

 

Being on a committee is a thankless job. We are lucky in that, to my limited knowledge, all who serve on bridge committees do it for the love of the game. While we have differences of opinion, the love of bridge overshadows all other considerations I think.

 

However, I must say, if you are on a committee and there is a potential conflict of interest situation, I will still point it out, and if I happen to meet you, would let you know that I think the right action would be to excuse yourself from that committee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely a hand of sheer beauty.

 

Please forgive my negligence. What is meant by winkle?

Terrence Reese in his book "Master Play" (I think in England it might have a different name) describe the Winkle (along with the vise and stepping stone).

 

Here is a nice write up describing a winkle Bridgeguys on Winkle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrence Reese in his book "Master Play" (I think in England it might have a different name)

"The Expert Game"

 

(and in English English it's a vice squeeze, not a vise)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...