han Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 In third seat, red against white you pick up the lovely: xxxA10xxxxJ9xx It goes pass pass to you, you are playing IMPs, what do you do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggieb Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 2D Goodness, with 6-4 distribution in third seat you will need to come up with something better than unfavorable vulnerability to stop me from preempting! ;) :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 In third seat, red against white you pick up the lovely: xxxA10xxxxJ9xx It goes pass pass to you, you are playing IMPs, what do you do? Pass, I prefer to stick to old fashion 2=3=4 even in third seat but this may be out of date winning bridge. At least if I open 2d partner has an agreement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 2♦ just barely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OleBerg Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 For a compulsive overbidder like me, 2♦ is a wtp?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 2♦ if avaible, if not I will pass, 3♦ is too m uch even for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanoi5 Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 1 or 3♦. 1♦ is probably more dangerous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 If I read him correctly, Kit Woolsey considers ATxxxx the second worst 6-card suit to preempt on (Axxxxx would be the worst), but eh we have a weak hand with diamonds so I will not overthink this and bid 2♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benlessard Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 You wont buy the hand so why tell declarer how to play the hand ? As for lead directing its unlikely theyll play in NT. At a suit contract. Its possible that a S lead blow a trick while a D lead is best but other than that I see no point in preempting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 You wont buy the hand so why tell declarer how to play the hand ? As for lead directing its unlikely theyll play in NT. At a suit contract. Its possible that a S lead blow a trick while a D lead is best but other than that I see no point in preempting. When I preempt, it isn't because I want to buy the hand, and lead-direction is only a secondary objective. The main purpose of preemption is to take away the opponents' bidding space, in the hope that this causes them to play at the wrong level or in the wrong strain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 seems like a canonical 2D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 As my partnership plays light Major openings, I reliably 'know' opponents have M-fit and 26 hcp (maybe MM-double fit). 3D for me. Against non-vul esp -- Vul have little problem at IMP to decide game, 10-6 IMP for game; but nv 6-6 IMP so I have hope they mis-bid(small chance), over-bid(small chance), under-bid(big chance). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_KARLUK Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 Pass I do not see where is the rest 35 HCP. So I do not like to underline my weakness and unbalanced distribution. I think it may be an advantage for declarer on later steps. Bear in mind say p is max. and has 11 hcp, so opps are 24 hcp! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 As my partnership plays light Major openings, I reliably 'know' opponents have M-fit and 26 hcp (maybe MM-double fit). 3D for me. Against non-vul esp -- Vul have little problem at IMP to decide game, 10-6 IMP for game; but nv 6-6 IMP so I have hope they mis-bid(small chance), over-bid(small chance), under-bid(big chance). Or double and kill you in 3♦ (biggest chance!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keylime Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 I pass. Bidding 2D when pard didn't open....nah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted December 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 Interesting that both gnasher and jdonn correct others but refuse to say what they would do with this hand. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 Interesting that both gnasher and jdonn correct others but refuse to say what they would do with this hand. :P My answer was a fert. It had no constructive qualities, but was a necessary element of my overall posting system. I would bid 2♦ and hope I don't go for a number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 Interesting that both gnasher and jdonn correct others but refuse to say what they would do with this hand. :P I was merely trying to keep the discussion focused on things that matter. Since you ask, I'd pass, feeling a little old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 2D and this is why. It is 100% clear that this hand belongs to the opponents.I have been presented with a way to interfere cheaply with their bidding mechanisms. When I bid this quaint 2D, LHO can rip off about two-thirds or more of his convention card - this seemingly innocuous bid of 2D takes away. 1-level minor openings and rebids1-level major openings and forcing NT1N opening bid and 2-level transfersOpeners reverses.Openers 1-level bids with subsequent jump rebidOpeners 1-level bids with subsequent jump shiftsOpening strong 1C and 2CAnd on and on and on. Turn the convention card over and look at that one little corner that describes defensive bidding - after a 2D opening, that's all the opponents get to use. IMHO, any partner worth the name would understand the 3rd-seat aspect of a weak 2-bid and never hang you so you go for a number. It's kind of like balancing - partner should know you already bid his cards when you opened 2D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 In third seat, red against white you pick up the lovely: ♠ xx ♥ x ♦ A10xxxx ♣ J9xxIt goes pass pass to you, you are playing IMPs, what do you do? IMO 2♦ = 10, _P = 7, 3♦ = 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
effervesce Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 2♦ for me. Things in favor of bidding:-3rd seat. You know it's the opp's hand, and want to preempt them from the right place-6/4 shape against bidding:-poor suit at adverse vul We may go for a number, but the 3rd seat and 6/4 tilt it enough to make bidding outweigh the sizable risk of going for a large number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
effervesce Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 I pass. Bidding 2D when pard didn't open....nah. It's when partner's a passed hand that makes it even BETTER to preempt than worse - because you are so much more likely to a) not have gameb ) partner is more likely to have a fit given he did not preempt himselfc) the opps are more likely to have game/slam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ochinko Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 Would anyone consider 2NT if it shows both minors and a weak hand? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 So, continuing my new role of discussion policeman: IMHO, any partner worth the name would understand the 3rd-seat aspect of a weak 2-bid and never hang you so you go for a number. It's kind of like balancing - partner should know you already bid his cards when you opened 2D.The main risk of preempting isn't that partner will overcompete. The risks are that:- You are already too high and get caught.- You tell them how to make a contract that would otherwise have gone down.- You encourage them to play in a making 3NT instead of a non-making suit contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flameous Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 Easy 2D. All white 3D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.