helene_t Posted November 18, 2008 Report Share Posted November 18, 2008 Can you do something with the hierarchical clustering to make it a little more legible? hmmm ... maybe it's possible to spread the clusters more apart. Anyway, hierarchical clustering sucks. A mixture model (such as what I think Richard used) is more appropriate for this purpose. I wondered if there was any clustering at all. Richard's results are one main cluster and a few outliers, which suggests there is no significant clustering. On the other hand the statistic of Euclidean distances is bimodal, something that does not come up in simulated data. That is a rather ad-hoc test though. (In the meantime, Robert has arrived in the middle of the diagram and further dilutes the clustering). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted November 18, 2008 Report Share Posted November 18, 2008 Can you do something with the hierarchical clustering to make it a little more legible? hmmm ... maybe it's possible to spread the clusters more apart. Anyway, hierarchical clustering sucks. A mixture model (such as what I think Richard used) is more appropriate for this purpose. I wondered if there was any clustering at all. Richard's results are one main cluster and a few outliers, which suggests there is no significant clustering. On the other hand the statistic of Euclidean distances is bimodal, something that does not come up in simulated data. That is a rather ad-hoc test though. (In the meantime, Robert has arrived in the middle of the diagram and further dilutes the clustering). Actually, I used a heirachical clustering... I could run kmeans, but there doesn't seem to be much point with so few data points. The keu point is that there doesn't seem to be any (obvious) cluster to the data. It looks as if there is a fairly large diffuse cloud with some outliers. One of these days I should give some thought to some kind of dynamic algorithm to select the number of clusters... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted November 18, 2008 Report Share Posted November 18, 2008 hmmm ... your four clusters are different from my four top clusters. Somehow we must have used different parameters. Did you use some other metric than the Euclidean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted November 18, 2008 Report Share Posted November 18, 2008 hmmm ... your four clusters are different from my four top clusters. Somehow we must have used different parameters. Did you use some other metric than the Euclidean? I think that I used Euclidean distance It's difficult to read dendograms and the results aren't always intuitive. You might want to rerun your analysis and specifically configure the system to find four clusters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted November 18, 2008 Report Share Posted November 18, 2008 We could also have used different agglomeration method. Anyway, let's just assume the two scores are beta-distributed and independent. The data set is too small to support anything more complex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uqx Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 To please Helene, here's another datapoint :-) Economic Left/Right: -6.38Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onoway Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 and another, -6.12 econ -5.44 social Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickRW Posted November 23, 2008 Report Share Posted November 23, 2008 Well, if you're still collecting data, my wife took the test (she isn't really a bridge player - if that is relevant to you). Her answers were quite a bit different to mine - but the end result was almost identical to me never the less - sorry I don't remember the exact numbers - but extraordinarily close to mine anyway. Nick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 Economic: -2.88Social: -4.51 I was disappointed to find there was no question asking for agreement/disagreement with "Tests such as this one are a crock of *****". Probably that would have moved my social score a bit to the left. But then I have not until now been placed in the moral proximity of Gandhi so maybe I should not complain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 Charts have been updated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 I also took the test. I remember that my score was significantly different from any score I had seen at that point, and was closer to Ghandy than to Hitler. As a further clue, it was Thursday and it rained. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_U_Card Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 I also took the test. I remember that my score was significantly different from any score I had seen at that point, and was closer to Ghandy than to Hitler. As a further clue, it was Thursday and it rained. Next you'll be sporting a Palin '12 button??? B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrTodd13 Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Economic: -2.88Social: -4.51 I was disappointed to find there was no question asking for agreement/disagreement with "Tests such as this one are a crock of *****". Probably that would have moved my social score a bit to the left. But then I have not until now been placed in the moral proximity of Gandhi so maybe I should not complain. Written by someone with some blinders on for sure. I would have taken the test but it is impossible to complete when there are multiple choice questions where I don't agree with any of the possible answers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Btw, it would be curious to see a plot with a different color for US citizens... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 it is impossible to complete when there are multiple choice questions where I don't agree with any of the possible answers. OK, then I can plot you on the compass. If you "disagree strongly" with everything you get exactly 0 for economics and something like -3.9 for lib/aut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Btw, it would be curious to see a plot with a different color for US citizens... http://www.geocities.com/helene_thygesen/compasconti.jpgRed=USBlue=Europe (yes, including Britain, sorry if someone feel offended :unsure: )Green=Others I did t-test and F-test for US versus Europe. The only trend that is significant is that w.r.t. economics left/right, variance is higher among US'ians than among Europeans. p=0.01888 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 I did t-test and F-test for US versus Europe. The only trend that is significant is that w.r.t. economics left/right, variance is higher among US'ians than among Europeans. p=0.01888 Americans are extremists!(There are sooo many ways in which this catch-phrase makes sense...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_U_Card Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 If you connect the dots in just the right way, you can make some very rude pictures!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrTodd13 Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 it is impossible to complete when there are multiple choice questions where I don't agree with any of the possible answers. OK, then I can plot you on the compass. If you "disagree strongly" with everything you get exactly 0 for economics and something like -3.9 for lib/aut. How does a pacifist anarchist answer the question about military actions outside international law? If you say no then you seem to support international law and if you say yes then you imply that some war is justifiable. The question also fails to differentiate offensive from defensive actions but I assume they mean offensive because I'm not aware of any "international law" that forbids you from defending yourself. Also, there are some questions that have nothing to do with economics or the use of the force of law. How can such questions affect economic and authoritarian scores? Does simply believing that something like sex outside marriage is immoral make one an authoritarian? To me, you can hold any view you wish but if you try to force it upon others you are the authoritarian. I also don't think of that question as a left/right issue. Anyway, I would prefer not to have a data for me in the graph guessing at how I would have answered. All I do know is that I am about as anti-authoritarian as you can get so I should be the minimum on that axis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 How does a pacifist anarchist answer the question about military actions outside international law? If you say no then you seem to support international law and if you say yes then you imply that some war is justifiable. Yes, agree. That was one I found difficult myself also. Anyway, I would prefer not to have a data for me in the graph guessing at how I would have answered. All I do know is that I am about as anti-authoritarian as you can get so I should be the minimum on that axis.Of course, I was just joking :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 I regard it as self-evident that this sort of test should not be taken seriously at all. The first question reads: "If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations." To start with, "should" means what? "I prefer"? I usually think in more concrete terms. A few years back I toured a plant across the Rio Grande from El Paso. They assemble radiators there. Employees are paid much less than in the US. On the other hand, people migrate northward in heavy numbers to work in this and similar plants because the situation is much better there than in southern Mexico. Further, the employees can live freely instead of dodging INS and paying off predatory coyotes to smuggle them into the US. So: Would I like the employees to be paid better? Yes. And if that means paying more for my radiator, I'm fine with that. Do I think the company should be shut down? No. So how do I answer question 1? Pretty much the same applies to all the other questions. Of course I would not (Q2) always support my country right or wrong. For example, if my country wanted to send me off to Gitmo and torture me, I would definitely be opposed to that. If they want to torture my neighbor, I'll think about it. Which neighbor do they have in mind? The one with the loud radio? I took the test since everyone else was, and it's fine for whatever fun it provides, but as a serious measure of anything, they gotta be kidding. Added: When I started at the University of Minnesota in 1956 we were all required to take the MMPI (Minnesota Multi-Phasic Inventory, I think). The rumor was that the scores on a coed's exam were good indicators of her receptiveness to sexual suggestions. This was a big issue for guys in 1956. Possibly it still is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickRW Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Blue=Europe (yes, including Britain, sorry if someone feel offended :P ) Why would we be offended? Like quite a lot of other Brits (from all political tendencies as far as I can see) I am rather sceptical that the 'European Agenda' is in either Britains' or, indeed, Europes' best interests. However, personally speaking, I am certainly not offended at being considered to be European. Brits tend to have some inappropriate stereotypical views of other nationalities - but we're not the only ones by a long way! Nick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 I also took the test. I remember that my score was significantly different from any score I had seen at that point, and was closer to Ghandy than to Hitler. As a further clue, it was Thursday and it rained. Next you'll be sporting a Palin '12 button??? :P Oh I hope that she will run again, yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 Next you'll be sporting a Palin '12 button??? Oh I hope that she will run again, yes. You only want to watch her ideologies bounce.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted November 27, 2008 Report Share Posted November 27, 2008 Hey Winston, good to see you! Where have you been? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.