plaur Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 [hv=d=l&v=b&n=s9xxhxdxxxcaqjt9x&s=sak8xhk8xxda8c8xx]133|200|Scoring: MPp - p - 1♥-1♠2♥-2♠- p - p3♥-3♠- p - pX - p p p [/hv]RHO opened 1♥ in third and I overcalled 1♠ with a 4 bagger. Partner put me in 3♠ and we had a little discussion who was to blame for minus 200. (3♥ is down). What do you say?Btw are you a 3♣ opener i 2nd? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sceptic Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 so he failed to open in 2nd despite ur agreements. his fault (but that never happened so I think 2 spades was ok, I think the decision to go to 3 spades was yours, he should not have made that call with his hand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 If you are going to overcall with a short suit, dont blame partner when he puts you to 3 here. & no, this isnt a 3♣ opener for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 N is short in hearts so his 3♠ bid is acceptable IMHO. He could also have made a fit-non-jumpo of 3♣ over 2♥. FWIW I don't like this 1♠ overcall. At least if you do this undiscussed, be prepared toi take the blame for results like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 I have said it hundreds of times. If you overcall on four card suits, your partner will overcompete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 You'll have to take the negatives of the system. If you overcall with a 4-card then often this will give your partner the good lead. But if the overcall can be a 4 or a 5 card then your partner will over- or under-compete (If he assumes either a 4 or a 5-card). ..If your overcall can possibly be a 4-card then 3S is too much.Because I'm an LOTT believer, I prefer to have a 5-card. (I would open 3C only in 3th seat). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 Hi, 1S is fine, ... assuming you have agreed on overcalls with 4 cards. I dont like 3S, and this is indepent of the fact, that 1S couldbe based on 4 cards.Partner did hear 2S, and he will be able to see my heartshortage. I you played non fit jumps (not a B/I topic), partner couldhave bid 3C instead of 2S, being a passed hand, the bid has to show tolerance for spades, ... well lots of peoble willdisagree. With kind regardsMarlowe PS: And no, I dont open 3C, not at this colors, make it greenvs. red, and I am ok with the bid, even in 1st / 2nd chair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plaur Posted November 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 Hi, 1S is fine, ... assuming you have agreed on overcalls with 4 cards.No, we have no agreement on 4 card overcalls. I is very rare that I do it, and partner was surprised I only had 4. I allready apologized to her for critizing her bid! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 Worst Bid: 1♠ Too much defense, not enough playing strength in ♠. If you're going to force me to bid with that (not my style), I'd bid 1NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trumpace Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 To me 3♠ looks like a unilateral decision. You don't have a fourth trump and you don't know if pd has some heart values. Playing in 3♥ X is a distinct possibility, which only partner can decide. Sometimes partner will pass 3♥ when 3♠ is making, but I don't think you should bid 3♠ because of that. Also, your entry position is not great (especially if you have to ruff a heart), and your club holding might not be worth much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 I frequently bid 1 Spade with 4 cards, but the suit is still not good enough.Make it AKJT and I will. So I totally agree with Tyler here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benoit35 Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 After the 1♥ opening, I find that hand: - Too short in spades for a 1♠ overcall- Too weak for a 1NT overcall- Too long in hearts for a double. Being handcuffed, I pass contentedly, hoping opponents will bid their hearts too far. Partner is welcome to compete with his clubs. If he shows a bit of strength, I might even double 3♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 I frequently bid 1 Spade with 4 cards, but the suit is still not good enough.Make it AKJT and I will. So I totally agree with Tyler here. For me the suit quality would also not be sufficient,I would need at least the ten instead of the 8. But I remembered weaker suits, and proponentsof 4 card overcalls said, they would, so I was saying to myself, it is a style issue. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keylime Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 I understand the 1S call for the lead direction, but 4 hearts is a big minus. This hand has the potential of breaking badly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 Just to clarify, I have no real issue on 4 card overcalls, either on AKxx or in general. I do have a very real issue with doing it on a hand that will quite possible take two trump tricks in the opponents suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 I understand the 1S call for the lead direction, but 4 hearts is a big minus. This hand has the potential of breaking badly. Wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lobowolf Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Pretty good group effort, I think, to get to an unfavorable spot. Someone...maybe Kit Woolsey, maybe Jeff Rubens (probably someone else) made the point that in a competitive auction when one partner has shortness in the opponents' suit, and one partner his length, usually the partner with the length is better placed to make the final competitive decision. North has a singleton heart and knows that south has some hearth length, but doesn't know whether south's hearts are worthless cards or honors. In contrast, south with his heart length is perfectly capable of inferring north's shortness, and SOUTH also knows whether his own hearts are worthless, which will make the hand more offensively-oriented (along splinter principles), or honors, which will make the hand more defensively oriented. Just another consideration by which north might have preferred to let south make the decision over 3♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts