H_KARLUK Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 [hv=d=e&v=b&w=sa2hat74dkj8ck965&s=sjt954hqj63d6ca74]266|200|Scoring: IMP1NT>2♣2♠>3♣ 3♦>6 NT ♠J led. Won by table.[/hv] 1) ♠J - A - 3 - 6 2) ♦K - 3 -2 -6 3) ♦8 - 9 - T -♠4 4) ♣3 - 4 - K - 2 5) ♦J - 5 - Q - ♥3 6) ♦ A - ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASkolnick Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 I know I am probably wrong, but here is what I think. If declarer is 4-2-5-2, on the 5th diamond I will be squeezed, even if I choose to throw the AC, since the 5th diamond will eliminate my strip card or set up his QC. KQxxKxAQTxxQx However, if for some reason partner holds the QS with Qx, my spades are protected if I go down to the JTx, therefore, I will eventually pitch a low club and a low spade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanoi5 Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 Can't I just discard a club now? Is that the problem or is the problem coming later? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_KARLUK Posted November 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 Hi, Sorry, ASkolnick and Hanoi5. You got that wrong:( I don't think 4252 usual NT opening. How about to focus those : NT range is 15-17. When I count my hand I see 8 HCP, Dummy shouts 15 HCP. We reached total 23 HCP. 40 HCP in deck so if rest 17 HCP with declarer nothing to do. He brings th contract home with 3S+2H+4D+3C while his C holding is at least QJx. Then you might question what if p has only 1 HCP with a "good" shape?If missing club knave accompanied by ten and small three times with your partner can you set the game? I think : "yea":rolleyes: Omg, i told a lot again. How careless I am, why i do that;-) Soon, I will try to clarify what's wrong about which discards. Best regardsHamdi p.s. I believe it is more easier for us to remember the correct move if we are aware of the reasoning behind it. Do you agree?:ph34r: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 Well, it would be nice to know a bit about the opponents' bidding.What strength was the 1NT opening, for example?What did 2C mean?What did 2S mean?What did 3C mean?What did 3D mean? If we assume that 2C was Stayman, that 3C and 3D were natural, and that 1NT was 15-17 balanced, then I'd still like to know if opener can be 4=2=5=2, but I would assume not, as that isn't a 1NT opening for most people I know. Or can declarer have five spades? What about 5=2=4=2? There are three possible interpretations of partner's 2 of spades at trick 1:- he wants to give count, but can't because he has Hx- he knows that we know the spade count, and is giving suit preference to show us that he has a club honour- he is playing a card at random so as not to help declarer, as he knows that we know the spade count. The whole "he knows that we know the spade count" depends on declarer not being possibly 5=2=4=2, or 5=3=3=2 and bidding a diamond fragment. But let's assume that is the case. That means that declarer one of the following hand type(s) KQxxKx(x)AQ10x(Q/J)x(x) KxxxKxAQ10xQJx if he's got the second hand he's just cold (and he's played it a rather odd way) via a major suit squeeze, given that clubs are 3-3. If he hasKQxxKxAQ10xQxx we are triple squeezed without the count. If we let the club go, he discards a heart from dummy and ducks out the ace of clubs and has 12 tricks. If we unguard spades, he discards a club from dummy and cashes the spades, catching us in a heart/club strip squeeze. If he unguard hearts, he discards a club from dummy and has 12 tricks with 4 hearts, 3 spades, 4 diamonds and a club. What aboutKQxxKxAQ10xJxx (carefully without the C10)we can discard the ace of clubs now. But he just crosses to dummy and leads a club towards the jack, making 3 clubs, 3 spades, 2 hearts, 4 diamonds.So there's no point worrying about that hand. That leavesKQxxKxxAQ10xQx (or Jx) If we just discard a low club he's stuck. So I must be missing something: either it's cold, or we make the obvious discard of a low club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_KARLUK Posted November 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 For FrancesHinden : If he hasKQxxKxAQ10xQxx we are triple squeezed without the count. If we let the club go, he discards a heart from dummy and ducks out the ace of clubs and has 12 tricks. If we unguard spades, he discards a club from dummy and cashes the spades, catching us in a heart/club strip squeeze. If he unguard hearts, he discards a club from dummy and has 12 tricks with 4 hearts, 3 spades, 4 diamonds and a club. Sir are you sure please? SincerelyHamdi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 This is a much harder problem than those you posted earlier, and it definitely belongs in this forum. As Frances says, it's a good idea to provide an explanation of the bidding. This forum is read by people from all over the world, and things that are standard in one country may mean something completely different in others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 OK, let's have a rethink .......................Ax.......................A10xx.......................KJx.......................K9xx J109xx..........................................xxQJxx.............................................9xxx..................................................xxxxxAxx..............................................Jxx .......................KQxx.......................Kx.......................AQ10x.......................Qxx After the ace of spades, a diamond, a club to the king and two more diamonds, we are here: .......................x.......................A10xx.......................-.......................9xx 109x..........................................xQJx.............................................9xx-..................................................xxAx..............................................Jx .......................KQx.......................Kx.......................A.......................Qx on the last diamond:- if we let a spade go, he has 11 tricks and an easy rounded suit strip squeeze- if we let a heart go he has 12 gtricks at once-if we let a low club go, he ducks out the ace of clubs and has 12 tricks - I missed out if we let the ace of clubs go, but actually we are still stuck even then. He can't set clubs up, but what he can do is cash the queen of clubs and throw us in with the last spade to give 3 heart tricks (or finesse against the CJ if he started with Q10). But if declarer instead started with the jack of clubs instead of the queen, my comment "But he just crosses to dummy and leads a club towards the jack, making 3 clubs, 3 spades, 2 hearts, 4 diamonds."isn't right, because partner has a diamond to cash. So what if declarer started with Jxx in clubs? This is the end position .......................x.......................A10xx.......................-.......................9xx 109x..........................................xQJx.............................................9xx-..................................................xxAx..............................................Qx .......................KQx.......................Kx.......................A.......................Jx actually now we can happily throw a low club. So I'm still back to throwing a low club on the 4th diamond, playing partner to hold the queen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 .......................x.......................A10xx.......................-.......................9xx109x..........................................xQJx.............................................9xx-..................................................xxAx..............................................Jx.......................KQx.......................Kx.......................A.......................Qx - I missed out if we let the ace of clubs go, but actually we are still stuck even then. He can't set clubs up, but what he can do is cash the queen of clubs and throw us in with the last spade to give 3 heart tricks (or finesse against the CJ if he started with Q10).I don't think that's right. When we're in with the fourth spade, we can exit with a low heart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanoi5 Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 I said nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 .......................x.......................A10xx.......................-.......................9xx109x..........................................xQJx.............................................9xx-..................................................xxAx..............................................Jx.......................KQx.......................Kx.......................A.......................Qx - I missed out if we let the ace of clubs go, but actually we are still stuck even then. He can't set clubs up, but what he can do is cash the queen of clubs and throw us in with the last spade to give 3 heart tricks (or finesse against the CJ if he started with Q10).I don't think that's right. When we're in with the fourth spade, we can exit with a low heart. That's true. So throwing the ace of clubs gets you into the papers when that is the layout, but makes you look remarkably stupid when declarer is 4=3=4=2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_KARLUK Posted November 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 [hv=d=e&v=b&n=sa2hat74dkj8ck965&w=sjt954hqj63d6ca74&e=sxxhxxxd97xxxcjtx&s=skqxxhkxdaqtxcqxx]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv] FrancesHinden Posted on Nov 4 2008, 08:58 PM "That's true. So throwing the ace of clubs gets you into the papers when that is the layout, but makes you look remarkably stupid when declarer is 4=3=4=2" ----------------Uh Oh, everything in life has a price; defending tough contracts is no exception. Congratulations for "good work".Hamdi---------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dburn Posted November 5, 2008 Report Share Posted November 5, 2008 Uh Oh, everything in life has a price; defending tough contracts is no exception.Nor is playing them, of course. Whereas it seems only natural caution for declarer to play a club to the king before establishing East's long diamond, this is actually a mistake. Details left as an exercise for the reader, but commendation to the original poster for finding an example of a triple squeeze without the count - possibly one of the rarest positions in bridge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.