Gerben42 Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 I don't mind threads with more than 1 hand. 1. 2♠2. Show a forcing 5-5 majors hand, followed by 5♦ exclusion.3. I start with a double and follow that up with ♣4. The choice is between the reds, but ♦ seems too speculative and may give the contract. If we finesse partner with the lead, declarer would've probably managed to go right anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 I don't mind threads with more than 1 hand. Far better than hands with more than one thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted September 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 On 1 I bid 2H. Partner has AQJxx xx xx J10xx. On 2 partner has AQ10 xx AKQxx xxx. 6S is excellent and 6H is decent. On 4 declarer has AKQxxxxxx AKx x - and dummy has the club ace but no entry. Any lead but a club beats it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 On 1 I bid 2H. Partner has AQJxx xx xx J10xx. On 2 partner has AQ10 xx AKQxx xxx. 6S is excellent and 6H is decent. On 4 declarer has AKQxxxxxx AKx x - and dummy has the club ace but no entry. Any lead but a club beats it. On #1: Oops! On #2: Yeah, 6♠ should be reached, and no more. On #4: :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.