jdeegan Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 [hv=d=n&v=b&s=sk1052h8da984c10982]133|100|Scoring: IMP1♠-P-3♠-P3NT-P-4♦-P4♥-P-??[/hv]Playing 2/1. 3♠ is a normal limit raise (not Bergen) promising four trumps. 3NT is a slam invitational bid (forcing, not offering a choice of games). Cue bids show aces. Do you diagree with any of South's earlier bids? What do you bid now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 i don't think 3♠ is a very good call. 4x1 is not great shape, my suits have very poor texture. I am now snookered into 4♠, I would have preferred 4♠ on the previous round (if forced to 3♠ on the first). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 prefer 2s, if not playing bergen, not 3s now 4s....I have really overbid.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 3♠ was a serious overbid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachy Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 I think 3S was fine. Some posters think it was an overbid but I think it is a limit raise, the singleton heart providing the missing 2 or 3 "points" in addition to an ace and a king and 4 trumps. 2S would have been a severe underbid. Now 4S. Might have 4S last round, but if 3NT forces responder to cuebid, then 4D it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 OMG 2♠?????????? After having bid perfectly well up till now, I'll bid 5♥ and leave it to partner. I do think it's a good convention that 3NT by partner over 3♠ is a shortness ask, or 4 of another suit is a natural slam try (not just random-ace cuebid.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 I think 3♠ was a slight overbid, but an obvious one if you don't play mixed raises. Now I have cooperated enough, 4♠ is obvious, we don't have extras for our limit raise unless the heart shortness strikes gold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dicklont Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 4♠, I have done enough. 3♠ was a borderline limit raise, partners 3NT asked me to cuebid, so I did.There is nothing I can add to that, partner will have to judge for himself now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 It depends on your agreements here. If you're playing LTTC, I'd bid Blacky, otherwise I'd bid 4♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 We have our 3S bid. Like 4D. Now 4S for me and a tip of the hat to 5H bidders. How can 3S be an overbid when, with a queen more in spades, diamonds or clubs, it is fairly standard to force to game with 4H (splinter)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 OMG 2♠?????????? After having bid perfectly well up till now, I'll bid 5♥ and leave it to partner. I do think it's a good convention that 3NT by partner over 3♠ is a shortness ask, or 4 of another suit is a natural slam try (not just random-ace cuebid.) Yes -- Mathe. Good idea if you will treat a 7-HCP hand as a limit raise because of a stiff, which may or may not be duplicate value. Hate the actual agreements and sequence to date. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinidad Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 I don't mind 3♠. It would be good to know what 3NT actually means (other than slam invitation). What would 4♣ (instead of 3NT) have meant? The way I see it is that partner is actively looking for slam while I am holding 3 controls and a singleton. For my game invitation I have 7 HCPs and some extra's for the singleton. I could have had four jacks, three queens and a doubleton. In other words, while the values that I have appear to be minimal for a game invitation, they are maximal for a slam auction. Partner is inviting slam opposite a limit raise. Most limit raises do not contain a first round control and two second round controls. You could have had 2 aces and a singleton, but it is impossible to have more controls. I picked 5♥, but I could just bid 6♠. If partner needs more from me for his slam, he has overbid. Rik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 3♠ is a mild overbid, but nothing else fits. 4♠ is weird. When I used to bid 2♠, I would invariably hold my breath that pard doesn't make 10 tricks. When pard bids game, it will have some play. I don't like the cue bidding style and I didn't know anyone played like this anymore. In my style, I would be confident pard has a club control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firmit Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 In Norway - I really don't think you will find anybody bidding 3S. They'd all bid 3H - showing the singleton with 4c spade support and GI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 3S is an overbid as has been pointed out already. 4S now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 I've got all my bids this far. Now I think it's close. Have to say I hate the methods, not being able to show my singleton this far. I'm bidding 4♠ now, can't be certain that the 5-level is safe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 I dislike the methods as well but I think you bid it as well as you could so far. The 2S and 4S suggestions are really weird to me. I'd bid 4S now, it's a guessing game because neither of us has any idea what's going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.