Jump to content

Large Hadron Collider


paulg

Recommended Posts

If it would destroy the planet, which is not really possible, it would explain why we haven't made contact with alien life forms yet. Probably they also built a large hadron collider :)

 

I would prefer space exploration to funding either Iraq wars and LHCs, though. There's like gazillions of Euros to be made by space exploration. It's just that the time until your investment pays off is decades...

 

"Foreign aid" would be even better of course, when done right. But people have been discussing about the right way for decades :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been googling it lately, and I can't find anything that looks like a comprehensive list of all the doomsday predictions. But we hear about it when one comes up. Various philosophers of old came up with ballpark theories. The Mayan calendar expires in 2012 which means people theorise the world will end then. People thought the world might end in the year 2000 simply because it's a nice round number. The fears about the LHC destroying the earth are not all that different than the fears that the first trinity test (nuclear bomb) would ignite the world's atmosphere.

 

As for the economy of the LHC, well history have shown that investment in blind experimentation has often resulted in unexpcted rewards. I'm sure that this will be no different.

 

Back when we realised that rocks were actually composed of different materials such as iron and salt and coal, it heralded a new era of metallurgy. When we studied the metals and materials more closely and realised that they were made up of elements, the science of chemistry came along. The we studied elements to reveal they were made up of atoms with electrons and nucleii, which led to the field of electronics and electromagnetism. Then we realised the atoms were made up of protons and neutrons which gave us the power of nuclear energy as well as more understanding on radiation used for sterilization, chemotherapy, smoke detectors, etc.

 

So whose to say that splitting the protons and neutrons further won't achieve more understanding about science and lead to new technologies.

 

I remember reading somewhere that the total cost of the LHC was something like 0.1% of the world's combined GDP. (Need to check that figure)

 

But if so, then surely it is a worthwhile investment for something that could be as significant if not moreso than the moonlanding, the splitting of the atom, the discovery of the electron, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting comment in the HTML:

 

<!-- if the lhc actually destroys the earth & this page isn't yet updated please email mike@frantic.org to receive a full refund -->
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...