Jump to content

Responsive double rebid


jchiu

Your Call  

31 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Call

    • Pass
      8
    • 2[DI]
      4
    • 2[HE]
      17
    • 2N
      1
    • Other
      1


Recommended Posts

Good problem, there is something to be said for pass, 2D and 2H. Our club holding and the auction make it very likely that partner has club shortness. I'm bidding 2H, as partner is almost guaranteed to have 4+ hearts and may easily have 5. If partner has 5341 shape then I expect to hear 2S and we can retreat to 3D.

 

2S by partner would have been non-forcing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent problem.

 

I think its very likely that pard has 2=1 in the minors. At MPs I would pass, hoping for +300 or so. Maybe its right to do that at IMPs too.

 

Fred's words beckon as I consider 2. Considering I would make the same call with xxx KJx AJxxx xx, this really feels like a serious underbid.

 

Put me down for 3. I would like a 4th trump, but otherwise I think this is a good value bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I would try 2. 2nd choice 2. 3rd choice pass. I like the idea of defending doubled but the level is just too low and we're unlikely to get rich by doing so. +300 would be fortunate, +100 or -180 is more realistic.

 

I'd be interested to hear more opinions on 2 vs 2. I feel the 4-3 moysian should play well enough. Though some may feel pard should have more than a singleton of tolerance for their responsive double in case pard has no Major.

 

I'm not sure I want to jump when we may have no 8 card fit. Pard can still invite over 2 with 5s and I'll move then. But going higher with values but no fit seems risky to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pass

 

This is a great problem.

 

My reasoning is:

 

1. On a good day, opener is something close to 4=3=3=3 minimum and responder close to 3=3=3=4.

 

2. I have a good hand, and game is possible, but I can't be sure which game.

 

3. If I make a minimum rebid, I risk playing there when game is cold... thus partner will often pass me in 2 when 3N has play

 

4. If I make a strength showing bid... 2N or 3 appear to be the choices... 3 doesn't appeal at all for a variety of reasons... I may get to a silly contract when the other call would have worked. Thus 3 may get me to a poor 4, failing on a 4-2 trump break, while 2N may get me to 3N, and my hand doesn't much look like notrump anyway

 

5. If they make it, they score 180... hardly a disaster unless we can find and make a game

 

6. if they go down, they could easily fail by 3 tricks.

 

My plan is to lead the diamond Ace and to continue with diamonds unless the appearance of dummy and/or partner's card suggests otherwise. I think this is the way to a maximal outcome if partner is, for example, QJ10xx Axxx xx xx, and give partner the club J or even the 9, on some layouts, and this could be bloody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow all this 'excellent problem', I thought 2 was automatic! I certainly don't like pass at this low of a level.

Agree with this, don't think we can pass when partner can easily be 5-5 majors and we have a lowish HCP game and can't beat 2C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow all this 'excellent problem', I thought 2 was automatic! I certainly don't like pass at this low of a level.

Agree with this, don't think we can pass when partner can easily be 5-5 majors and we have a lowish HCP game and can't beat 2C.

Agree. 2 for me too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...