rogerclee Posted September 2, 2008 Report Share Posted September 2, 2008 IMPs, Red vs White, Fourth Seat ♠Ax ♥x ♦AQxx ♣AKJTxx (3♥) - P - (P) - ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 2, 2008 Report Share Posted September 2, 2008 So many of these today lol. Double, I will bid 4♣ over 3♠ (obvious) or 5♣ over 4♠ (maybe not so obvious?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted September 2, 2008 Report Share Posted September 2, 2008 3NT. RHO did not bid 4♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted September 2, 2008 Report Share Posted September 2, 2008 So many of these today lol. Double, I will bid 4♣ over 3♠ (obvious) or 5♣ over 4♠ (maybe not so obvious?) Agree. Didn't we have a 2=1=4=6 18 count over a heart preempt a few weeks ago? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted September 2, 2008 Report Share Posted September 2, 2008 Too good for any other action than double IMO. Other calls are too unilateral.Agree with Josh when it comes to continuations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted September 2, 2008 Report Share Posted September 2, 2008 Agree with double, that part is clear. Are you guys moving if partner bids 3NT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 2, 2008 Report Share Posted September 2, 2008 Agree with double, that part is clear. Are you guys moving if partner bids 3NT? YES! 4♣ seems obvious then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 Which warns no H-stop? Immediate 3NT or X then 3NT? Esp without spades, want 3NT if stop, else 4m/5+m. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 Agree with double, that part is clear. Are you guys moving if partner bids 3NT? YES! 4♣ seems obvious then. Agree, looks like we're getting to slam if partner can bid 3NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OleBerg Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 Agree with double, that part is clear. Are you guys moving if partner bids 3NT?No. I will not punish partner for taking a good stand on minimum values. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OleBerg Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 So many of these today lol. Double, I will bid 4♣ over 3♠ (obvious) or 5♣ over 4♠ (maybe not so obvious?)Agree with double and 4♣. I will pas 4♠ however. Partner should bid 4♥ with only 4-card spades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 Double and then 4♣ over 3♠/3NT and 5♣ over 4♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianshark Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 Agree with Dbl, 4♣ over 3♠ and 4♣ over 3NT. I'm definitely going to bid 5♣ over 4♠. There's no way I'm making partner play on a potential 4-2 fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 Agree with Dbl, 4♣ over 3♠ and 4♣ over 3NT. I'm definitely going to bid 5♣ over 4♠. There's no way I'm making partner play on a potential 4-2 fit. Escept partner would not bid spades twice with a 4 card suits Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianshark Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 Oh, I assumed we were talking about if he jumped to 4♠ directly over the double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 Oh, I assumed we were talking about if he jumped to 4♠ directly over the double. you're right of course. I should spend more time reading posts before I criticize them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 That would be a violation of internet protocols. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.