Jump to content

ahh science


onoway

Recommended Posts

I'm not surprised at all. Doesn't the who idea of concealment lend itself to this genre of human interaction?

 

Honestly I can only think of really 1 use otherwise and that would be observation of animal species or something like that. And the technology, I'm sure, is very far away from being affordable to that profession.

 

But then again I'm lacking in the creativity department; more so today, I feel, than usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among the real applications pondered for the future of real-world cloaking technology: stealth military devices and new medical techniques.

 

Doesn't sound to me like "the first use they can think of is for war" — except maybe for those people who sees "the ***** military" as the boogie man in everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that Lamont Cranston was the lead scientist? Who know what evil lurks in the heart of man!

 

Media folks need to explain that scientific advances are good for something since simply advancing knowledge doesn't sell. Also, the scientists want more funding. Lots more if they can get it. Explaining that it will help us go bomb someone is always a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Doesn't sound to me like "the first use they can think of is for war" — except maybe for those people who sees "the ***** military" as the boogie man in everything. "

 

Hmmm it seemed to me that "stealth military devices " implied something other than peaceful co-existence for mutual advantage.

Merriam-Webster's dictionary:

Main Entry: 1mil·i·tary

Pronunciation: \ˈmi-lə-ˌter-ē\

Function: adjective

Etymology: Middle English, from Latin militaris, from milit-, miles soldier

Date: 15th century

1 a: of or relating to soldiers, arms, or war b: of or relating to armed forces; especially : of or relating to ground or sometimes ground and air forces as opposed to naval forces

2 a: performed or made by armed forces b: supported by armed force

3: of or relating to the army

 

and

 

"Media folks need to explain that scientific advances are good for something since simply advancing knowledge doesn't sell. Also, the scientists want more funding. Lots more if they can get it. Explaining that it will help us go bomb someone is always a winner."

 

too true, Ken. Now if the only people able to use it were Lamont Cranston clones it would indeed be an advance for humanity! :)

 

"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...