Jump to content

Buffett Cup


jillybean

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Josh is not the only US junior, and I think any serious junior player should not turn down playing in a tournament of this level.

 

Any salary you might miss is worth less than the experience. If you feel differently, that's your decision of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh is not the only US junior, and I think any serious junior player should not turn down playing in a tournament of this level.

Is this a weekend event, or would it require time away from a non-bridge job? Or, are you suggesting that any "serious" junior player must be making a living from bridge?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.buffettcup.com/EventDetails/tab...US/Default.aspx

 

Timetable

 

The timetable for this year's event is as follows:

 

Mon Sept 15th: Opening Ceremony: Buffett Cup Day 1 (2 sessions)

 

Tues Sept 16th: Buffett Cup Day 2 (2 sessions)

 

Weds Sept 17th Buffett Cup Day 3 (2 sessions)

 

Thurs Sept 18th Buffett Cup Day 4 (1 session): Closing Banquet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt very much that Josh was in any way serious.

 

I suspect that any USA Junior player, even those who play professionally, would feel honored to be asked to play in this event and would accept such an invitation without second thought (provided of course that they did not already have unchangable plans for the time in which the tournament is scheduled).

 

While it is probably the case that some professional players in the USA are basically mercenaries, most are not. In my experience the mercenary attitude among some pros tends to form later in life. Most Juniors still love the game so much that being paid to play is a secondary consideration to having the opportunity to play in exceptional events.

 

Fred Gitelman

Bridge Base Inc.

www.bridgebase.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on guys, Josh was making a blatant joke in reply to my blatant joke. It is true that it would be hard for some of the non pro juniors to go becuse a lot of them have jobs/school and couldn't get the time off, but I'm sure most would be able to make time for an event like this. The truth is that almost all of the top juniors in USA are pros though (which would make it easy for them to be able to go, and I think all of us would miss a regional for this event).

 

Oh and for those who don't know, I'm sure Jdonn won't mind me sharing this, he had to take so much time off work to go to Thailand for the world junior championships 2 years ago that he would effectively have gotten fired so he QUIT HIS (good) JOB and then found a new one. That is the level of passion jdonn has for bridge! He clearly wouldn't demand to be paid to go to the Buffet Cup :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of 6/30 the average age in ACBL was 68.56. District 1 (eastern Canada) was youngest at 65.46, and District 9 (Florida) was oldest at 71.68. I don't know what the mean age was. My District is among the oldest at 69.70 but I am glad to say I am under that (barely).

 

Alan Sontag's "The Bridge Bum" was one of the first bridge books I ever read and I still chuckle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In our District it was money from the Buffet-Gates Bridge Foundation (name?) that made bridge classes in the Hawaii schools possible with a very positive result. After a huge fundraising campaign by the Hawaiian Units 11 juniors were sent to Atlanta, some of them very new players, and they all earned points and had a great time. All it takes is a couple of dedicated volunteers (like Busaba Williams of Hawaii) to get these things going. Sorry I am preaching. :unsure:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't they at least getting hotel and airfare for this?

I played in the first Buffett Cup (in Dublin a couple of years ago).

 

Our expenses were covered and, in general, we were treated like royalty by our wonderful Irish hosts. Among the many nice things they did for us: free tickets to watch the Ryder Cup (which I suspect were very expensive).

 

I don't know where the money to pay for all of this came from or if expenses will be covered for this year's Buffett Cup (but I am guessing yes).

 

Fred Gitelman

Bridge Base Inc.

www.bridgebase.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of 6/30 the average age in ACBL was 68.56. District 1 (eastern Canada) was youngest at 65.46, and District 9 (Florida) was oldest at 71.68. I don't know what the mean age was. My District is among the oldest at 69.70 but I am glad to say I am under that (barely).

 

Alan Sontag's "The Bridge Bum" was one of the first bridge books I ever read and I still chuckle.

Thanks for publishing this information

 

I don't suppose that you have any information about the rate of change in the mean membership age?

 

What was the mean membership age in 2001? 2002? ...

 

There's no (real) problem with having an old membership. However, if the average age of the membership is increasing rapidly over time this is very problematic.

 

For example, lets assume that the average age of ACBL members is 70. Furthermore, lets assume that the average age of ACBL members is increasing by .5 years, each year. Furthermore, lets (hypothetically) assume that ACBL drop off the face of the earth at age 78. This says that we're going to encounter some very real problems in 16 years or so.

 

BTW, its often more useful to study the median membership age rather than the mean. In particular, if you have a large demographic buldge working its way through the system its useful to know when that cadre will exit. (I run these types of models a lot at work. They're very useful for planning purposes)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For example, lets assume that the average age of ACBL members is 70. Furthermore, lets assume that the average age of ACBL members is increasing by .5 years, each year. Furthermore, lets (hypothetically) assume that ACBL drop off the face of the earth at age 78. This says that we're going to encounter some very real problems in 16 years or so.

But what if average life expectancy is increasing by .5 years each year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL I didn't notice the whole middle part of this thread. Sorry for making obvious jokes everyone! BTW the suggestion that I wouldn't go without being paid was the secondary joke, the real one was the suggestion that I would expect to be invited :unsure:

 

If any of you humorless people really want to know, if I was ever invited I would pay my own expenses if I had to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For example, lets assume that the average age of ACBL members is 70.  Furthermore, lets assume that the average age of ACBL members is increasing by .5 years, each year.  Furthermore, lets (hypothetically) assume that ACBL drop off the face of the earth at age 78.  This says that we're going to encounter some very real problems in 16 years or so.

But what if average life expectancy is increasing by .5 years each year?

Then the "Depends" folks are going to be very happy?

 

It goes without says that a real model will be a lot ore complex than what I sketched out.

 

A real model would want to develop a Probability Density Function describing the age at which a folks exit the system and track the extent to which this is changing over time. (As a more practical example, when a software company sells a copy of some product we get $X in revenue from the sale. We also expect that the customer will purchase support and maintenance contracts costing $Y for Z years)

If the marketing department is doing their job right, they can slice and dice this data and tell you how Z changes depending on the Industry that they are in, Nationality, or even the sate of the macro economy.

 

I suspect that the Vegas casinos do the same thing. The must be some model that says "It costs us $X to lure some guy from Peoria into our den of inequity. However, once he's inside we expect to take him for $Y". In contrast, folks from New England are stupod enough to play the slots, so we expect to generate $Z from them)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"den of inequity" - Richard, if that's a typo, it's hilarious; if it was on purpose, a more perfect description of a LV Casino I have not seen.

 

Re: cup, I would think that if expenses were not paid, that would be unseemly (and hard for juniors, even the pros. Tickets to middle of Kentucky (or Ireland) are not cheap). I think the event is fun, and for promoting the game, good, even if I'd rather watch the Norwegian team trials (for instance) - but of course, you don't have to promote *me* into the game!

 

I think a bigger problem are the people who according to one letter-writer this month, stay away from the Sunday Swiss because they, with their 2000-5000 (!) points, don't want to score against the big boys. Seriously, people, is there not a time when you're good enough at this game that you're just a little embarrassed to admit that you need to be protected?

 

Michael (2nd in X, 8th in A Sunday with my 600. Guess which one I'm more proud of?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"den of inequity" - Richard, if that's a typo, it's hilarious; if it was on purpose, a more perfect description of a LV Casino I have not seen.

Deliberate, but sadly not original

 

don't recall who came up with that one originally, but it wasn't me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of 6/30 the average age in ACBL was 68.56.  District 1 (eastern Canada) was youngest at 65.46, and District 9 (Florida) was oldest at 71.68.  I don't know what the mean age was.  My District is among the oldest at 69.70 but I am glad to say I am under that (barely).

 

Alan Sontag's "The Bridge Bum" was one of the first bridge books I ever read and I still chuckle.

Thanks for publishing this information

 

I don't suppose that you have any information about the rate of change in the mean membership age?

 

What was the mean membership age in 2001? 2002? ...

I wrote "high 50's" because I googled for median age of bridge players, and the only article I found was from 1997 and it said 54. I assumed it had gone up in the past decade, but I didn't think it had gone up so much. It's also possible that there's confusion between median and mean. I think the median skews higher than the mean, because of all the intermediate-age people who stop playing while they raise families.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I don't suppose that you have any information about the rate of change in the mean membership age?

 

What was the mean membership age in 2001? 2002? ..."

 

I probably have that info, but it's time for primetime Olympics, so I will look in the morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just received our schedule. We will be broadcasting from the word go, most likely from 6 tables throughout the four days. I'll have the schedule listed on our vugraph web page as soon as possible.

 

Scoring:

All tournaments are board-a-match (or point-a-board).

 

The winners of each Pairs round receive 4 points.

The winners of each Team segment receive 7 points.

The winners of each Individual round receive 1 point.

 

If there is a draw, the points are shared.

 

Thus there are available:

 

120 points in the Pairs.

126 points in the Teams.

132 points in the Individual.

 

The winners are the team that passes 189½ points.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

It has been confirmed that the organisers have 6 laptops and at least as many operators in Louisville. In other words: every single board at all tables will be broadcast on BBO from Monday.

 

I am in the process of recruiting at least a couple of commentators per table for all 22 sessions. Some (commentators, not sessions) will be added as we go.

 

Line-ups:

 

Europe:

Sabine Auken and Marion Michielsen

Michel and Thomas Bessis

Boye Brogeland and Espen Lindqvist

Tom Hanlon and Hugh McGann

Tor Helness and Jan Peter Svendsen

Michal Kwiecien and Jacek Pszczola

 

United States:

Bob Hamman and Zia Mahmood

Geoff Hampson and Dick Freeman

Alan Sontag and David Berkowitz

Tobi Sokolow and Janice Seamon-Molson

Howard Weinstein and Steve Garner

Roy Welland and Bjorn Fallenius

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...