Jump to content

Valuation and Preferred Treatment


Echognome

1D - 1S; 2S - ?  

43 members have voted

  1. 1. 1D - 1S; 2S - ?

    • Pass
      4
    • 2NT (Spade length and min/max ask)
      5
    • 2NT (Some other game try)
      3
    • 3[sp] (Non Forward Going/Preemptive)
      3
    • 3[sp] (Invitational)
      14
    • 4[sp]
      12
    • Other (Please explain)
      2


Recommended Posts

Does anybody think it is a good idea to try for 3NT from partner's side? Does anybody have a method to do so?

I have the disturbing feeling that 3NT might be the best game, however, I have no idea how to intelligently explore it as a posisble game. Worse yet, I have the ugly feeling that exploring for 3NT might help the defense more than it helps us.

 

For what its worth, I normally play that 2NT is forcing, designed to explore for strain. Partner clarifies trump length

 

4+ = 4 card support, Club fragment

3N = 3 card support, little interest in a Moyisan

3 = 4 card Spade support and a minimum

3 = 3 Spades and short clubs

3 = 3 Spades and a minimum

3 = 3 Spades and short Hearts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't remember the hands, but at our table my partner passed 2 and at the other table Bocchi bid 2 over 1 showing an invitational hand with 6 (at least that's what I think teammates heard it as). I remember having 4=3=4=2 or 4=2=4=3 14 count with Qxxx of spades (so wastage) and pretty good controls. I felt an invite of some kind was warranted, but just shrugged it off at the table.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...