Jump to content

'08 Spingold/Wagar Pool


HeavyDluxe

Recommended Posts

Announcing the 2008 BBOF Spingold & Wagar Pool!

 

Pick the outcome of the main events at this year's Summer NABC and win big prizes... After all, what greater prize is there than bragging rights and the adulation of your bridge peers?

 

Submissions should be posted to this thread so everyone can see who's in. If you really want, you can PM your submission to me instead. If you submit via the thread and change your mind before the deadline edit your original post to reflect the change, please.

 

Submissions must be made/received by 1pm PDT (20:00GMT) on Wednesday, July 23rd since that's when cards hit the table in Las Vegas.

 

SPINGOLD

* 4 losing quarterfinalists (3 points each)

* 2 losing semifinalists (6 points each)

* Runner-up (12 points)

* The winner (24 points)

 

WAGAR

* 2 losing semifinalists (4 points each)

* Runner-up (8 points each)

* The winner (16 points)

 

For a total of possible 92 points.

 

When you list your teams, please list the LASTNAME of the first person on the roster and the teams seed #, just so there's no confusion. For example:

Gordon (#38) or Gordon (#22)

 

Team rosters and (eventually) brackets can be found here.

 

Tiebreaker: What will be the margin of victory (in IMPS) in the Spingold Final on Sunday?

 

 

Results will be posted to no later than Monday morning (EST).

 

Good luck and happy VuGraphing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, bit like trying to pick a winner out of 100 horse race, but just for a laugh, how about:

 

SPINGOLD

* 4 losing quarterfinalists (3 points each)

* 2 losing semifinalists (6 points each)

* Runner-up (12 points)

* The winner (24 points)

 

Quarters: O'Rourke #3, Ekeblad #9, Lynch #12, Mahaffey #16

Semis: Strul #4, Cayne #2

Runner up: Nickell #1

Winner: Gromov #5

 

 

WAGAR

* 2 losing semifinalists (4 points each)

* Runner-up (8 points each)

* The winner (16 points)

 

Semis: Yalan #5, Jacobs #6

Runner up: Bjerkan #3

Winner: Fireman #1

 

Tie breaker = 43.

 

Most probably I will score nothing!

 

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, bit like trying to pick a winner out of 100 horse race...

Yeah, that's the reason I thought give ppl 'til tomorrow to submit. At least by that point you're down to 32 teams to choose from...

 

If we extended the deadline into Thursday, we basically 'lose' the Wagar. I'm no opposed to that. Then you're picking from 16 teams in the Spingold.

 

If the group feels strongly, we can extend the picks into Thursday. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spingold

 

Cayne (2) to win by 26 imps from Strul (4), then Brogeland (17) and O'Rourke (3), followed by Mahaffey (16), Shi (45), Diamond (24) and Kamil (23).

 

Notable omission: Team 1, because I think some players in Teams 16 and 17 have good form, making Team 1's draw too tough. Better to be seeded 2 or 3 this time.

 

Wagar

McCallum (2) by 1 imp from Fireman (1) then Yalan (5) and Bjerkan (3)

followed by Jacobs (6), Westheimer (8) , Mancuso (4) and Sulgrove (7).

 

Peter Gill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update from Jan (Thanks Jan!):

 

There will be Vugraph from the Spingold, but they didn't know when it would start because of not knowing the number of teams. I think they're trying to start it today, but since I'm being a bridge player at least for another day and hopefully longer, I don't actually know. I promise they're planning to cover from the Round of 32 at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we extended the deadline into Thursday, we basically 'lose' the Wagar. I'm no opposed to that. Then you're picking from 16 teams in the Spingold.

 

If the group feels strongly, we can extend the picks into Thursday. Thoughts?

Nah, them that post late can enter for half points is my idea.

 

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone found a nice tree showing the brackets?

ACBL has one up for the Wagar. They have a tendency not to put up[ bracket sheets until the round of 16, so I suspect there won't be one until after completion of play on Wednesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone found a nice tree showing the brackets?

ACBL has one up for the Wagar. They have a tendency not to put up[ bracket sheets until the round of 16, so I suspect there won't be one until after completion of play on Wednesday.

There are complete Spingolds bracket sheet in Daily Bulletin, pages 6 & 7

 

 

 

PS. Uday faces today the eastern power of team Gromov, good luck for him! :(

 

 

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this is predicated on the assumption that Cayne plays the length of the series

 

Four Losing Quartfinalists:

 

2: Cayne

4: Struhl

6: Schwartz

8: Meltzer

 

Two Losing Semi Finalists:

 

1. Nickell

7. Sadek

 

Losing Finalist:

 

3. O'Rourke

Top Dog:

 

5. Gromov

 

[Edit: Guess it was a mistake not to have looked at last night's results before picking Struhl to make it into the elite 8... Oh well]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After seeing the brackets, my guess is:

 

QF: Brogeland(#17), Konow(#61), Narasimhan(#10), O'Rourke(#3)

SF: Meltzer(#8), Schwarz(#6)

RU: Gromov(#5)

W: Weed(#2)

 

I had picked Strul instead of Konow before today's bulletin reported the results. MFA is playing in team Konow. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my shot:

 

SPINGOLD

* 4 losing quarterfinalists: Meltzer (#8), Sadek (#7) , Goren (#55), O'Rourke (#3)

* 2 losing semifinalists: Lynch (#12), Schwartz (#6)

* Runner-up: Weed (#2)

* The winner: Nickell (#1)

 

WAGAR

* 2 losing semifinalists: Mancuso (#4), Jacobs (#5)

* Runner-up: Fireman (#1)

* The winner: Baker (#2)

 

 

 

One FINAL note: Remember you can edit your picks until 1PM Las Vegas time today. At that point, I'll pull all the picks out into a spreadsheet for scoring.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this is predicated on the assumption that Cayne plays the length of the series

 

Four Losing Quartfinalists:

 

2: Cayne

29: Markowicz,

6: Schwartz

8: Meltzer

 

Two Losing Semi Finalists:

 

1. Nickell

7. Sadek

 

Losing Finalist:

 

3. O'Rourke

Top Dog:

 

5. Gromov

 

[Edit: Guess it was a mistake not to have looked at last night's results before picking Struhl to make it into the elite 8... Oh well]

Since I get to edit my picks still

 

Four Losing Quartfinalists:

 

2: Cayne

29: Markowicz,

6: Schwartz

8: Meltzer

 

Two Losing Semi Finalists:

 

1. Nickell

7. Sadek

 

Losing Finalist:

 

3. O'Rourke

Top Dog:

 

5. Gromov

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if I'm in time, but, if so:

 

Quarters: Lynch #12, Mahaffey #16, Meltzer #8, Konow #61

Semis: Ekeblad #9, Tuszynski #20

Runner up: Nickell #1

Winner: Gromov #5

 

Wagar

====

Semis: Simon #12, Jacobs #6

Runner up: Bjerkan #3

Winner: Fireman #1

 

Tie breaker = 43.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, just thought I'd post an update on the scores to date...

 

Right now, cherdano is in a pretty commanding lead (about 20 points on paper), but he has maxed out his points. His last 'live' teams in the Spingold - Gromov and Weed - were his picks to lose in the semifinals. So, even if one of them goes on to win it won't be worth more than 6 points to him.

 

Currently in a solid 2nd is PeterGill, thanks in part to some solid picks in Wagar. In fact, Peter will score some serious points for his pick of the Cayne team.

 

655321 actually could win handily, given that he still has Meltzer, Gromov, and Weed as live picks.

 

More tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to all who participated in the 2008 Spingold/Wagar Pool... Sorry for the delay!

 

As promised, here are the final standings:

 

1. cherdano (45pts)

2. hrothgar

3. NickRW

4. Peter Gill

5. HeavyDluxe

6. 655321

 

Congrats, Arend! Your picked a pretty middle-of-the-pack Spingold, but were powered victory by totally p0wning the Wagar picks.

 

A couple other notes, just for giggles:

The overall spread from winner to 6th place was 15pts.

 

If we were playing for the Spingold picks alone, hrothgar would be the runaway winner. He scored points for almost all his picks (only 'zeroing' on two) and backed the winning Gromov team for a whopping 24 pts by itself. If he entered an 'average' set of picks for the Wagar, he'd be the winner...

 

The 'total' spread was relatively tight between all pickers, so well done!

 

My closing thought would be that the weightings *might* be worth a little refinement for any future pools... But maybe I'm just being bitter!

 

Thanks all... And congrats to the winners. Next pool: Beijing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...