Jump to content

what to bid after opp unusal 2N


shanbari

Recommended Posts

3. This is non-forcing. A strong hand with spades would have bid 2 (some prefer 2, with 2 showing clubs)

Whereas I agree 100% with your post here, I unfortunately cannot ever get my opponents to allow the 2 call and the extra space that creates for constructive bidding. So, I resign myself to the mundane 3 UVU bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 which is not forcing... doesn't everyone play unusual verus unusual (with possible exception of TylerE)

Well, TylerE is committing to RKCB if Opener bids any black suit, meaning a simple raise to 4. So, apparently this is a GF hand with very serious slam interest.

 

Go get 'em, Tiger!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Club "fit" convinces me that its right to GF

 

I'll cue bid 3 or 3 depending on which shows a GFing hand with Spades.

I agree, the club fit makes this a GF.

 

I wonder what a direct 4 shows and how it differs from the cue-bid route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i guess i play un vs un different than others. because i play that 3S is non-forcing and 3D would shows LR+ in clubs and 3H would show invitational strength+ with a spade suit. Since my 8 hcp does not make this hand invitational unless partner has a fit, I'll just bid 3S.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a 3 bid (if this is your weakest spade bid) is a big underbid. You can call it invitational all day long, there are weaker hands where you need to bid. If I only have the choice between a non-forcing 3 or a game-forcing 3, then I think 3 is obvious.

 

I also thought 3 as inv+ with spades is NA standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also thought 3 as inv+ with spades is NA standard.

Oh, I thought 3H was gameforcing.

That, obviously, is open for agreement.

 

I prefer inv+, to be able to bid 3 only to compete. Both approaches have their up- and downside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also thought 3 as inv+ with spades is NA standard.

Oh, I thought 3H was gameforcing.

That, obviously, is open for agreement.

 

I prefer inv+, to be able to bid 3 only to compete. Both approaches have their up- and downside.

good to know 3h inv+. which is the bid i am looking for. thanks for all the reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=n&v=n&s=sakj9xxhxxdqctxxx]133|100|Scoring: IMP

N - E - S - W

1C (2N) ??

opps overcall 2n to shows diamond and heart, and N/S vul.

you are holding south hand, and what to bid ?[/hv]

IMO 4=10, 3=9 (Crowhurst), 3=5.

4 is a non-forcing fit jump. 4 and 4 would be splinters.

Crowhurst improves on the (later) Unusual over unusual. Eric Crowhurst published the convention in Acol in Competition (1981). Crowhurst reverses the meaning of the 3-level cue-bids so that opener with no fit in your suit has room for manoeuvre at the 3 level

  • 3 (Partner's suit) = Natural raise. Non-forcing.
  • 3 (new suit) = Natural. Non-forcing.
  • 3 (Lower ranking of opponent's suits) = Length in unbid suit. Forcing.
  • 3 (Higher ranking of opponent's suits) = Support for partner. Forcing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...