Ant590 Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 I just kibbed a tourney where the host broadcast that: "automatic penalty when you open a Polish or Precision 2♣ with no alert... that is CHEATING!" It is interesting that I find the use of this c-word far more offensive than the f in "wtf" discussion. While a polish 2♣ probably should be alerted (despite it being more natural than the standard 2♣), to call people that don't alert it cheats doesn't seem right to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 1. message to TD: I don't play Polish Club, and I am not playing Precision today. I also don't play in tournaments where the TD accuses people, a priori, of cheating.2. disconnect.3. If I paid to play, I demand my money back. Not that I expect that will do me any good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 a glowing endorsement of the qualification and ethics of some of the TDs out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Well it makes a change from the players accusing the other pair of cheating, TD is often called to investigate cheating when a bad auction results in a top board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotShot Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I estimate that the ratio of cheating accusations on BBO to actual cases of intentional cheating is something like 10000(0) to 1.Often these accusations come from people, who are totally unaware that they are using UI, unintentionally don't fully disclose their agreements, are unaware that signals and leads have to be disclosed too and don't even know that there are implicit partnership agreements. But they do know that psyching is evil and feel robbed if they don't make their high card trick because of a squeeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 In my experience, PC and Precision players usually alert their natural 2♣ openings while SA/SEF/etc players do not always alert their artificial 2♣ openings. Anyway, agree with Blackshoe. It would be better if the TD focused on creating a pleasant atmosphere instead of such non-provoked cheating accusations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Different countried different alert procdures. Here in Germany you do not need to alert 2 ♣ as long as it is strong and artifical, but you need to alert a prec. 2 Club opener. B) For this actual TD: Crazy guy, no sense for atmosphere and behaviour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 1. message to TD: I don't play Polish Club, and I am not playing Precision today. I also don't play in tournaments where the TD accuses people, a priori, of cheating.2. disconnect.3. If I paid to play, I demand my money back. Not that I expect that will do me any good. I totally agree with Blackshoe. Has this td been reported? (Actually I also find this more offensive than the wtf post, though that was extremely offensive as well.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I dont find this much worse than TD's who tell me I cant psyche in pos 1 and 2 :huh: This TD needs educating rather than reporting, people make up rules like this when they dont understand the systems that are being used and/or the rules of the game. But yes, I hate seeing people accusing others of cheating Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianshark Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 While the use of the word 'cheating' is a little extreme, the essense of the message, that people playing a natural 2♣ opening really really need to alert it, is sound. It was just a poor choice of words. Aren't people over-reacting just a little? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babalu1997 Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I just kibbed a tourney where the host broadcast that: "automatic penalty when you open a Polish or Precision 2♣ with no alert... sometimes people do not alert their non natural 2club open, or 1 club open because in their country or local club evryone plays the same system, so they see no need to alert.So sometimes it happens out of ignorance. But those no information availabe thing does tick me off. what i do is this, i inquire 1 club bids if the opps have no profile posted or have more than one system listed, and increasingly, i ask, before i make the first bid, what system they are playing. As to tds, much headache could be avoided it the tds were to read the communications concerning games at bbo which are sent to evry td and are pinned in this forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 If someone told me to f*** off at the table, I wouldn't be that upset. If someone told me I was a cheater, there would be retribution. It has happened once in real life (the guy got a ZT penalty on the spot, and later apologized) and once online (I counted a hand out and dropped a stiff King onside) and the guy thought I was wired. In a weird kind of way, being accused of cheating can actually be a compliment. TDs that make preemptive announcements like this don't understand their role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 This TD needs educating rather than reporting, people make up rules like this when they dont understand the systems that are being used and/or the rules of the game. I disagree with this. any TD that "needs educating" should NOT be a TD. with being a director comes the responsibility of knowing the laws, ethics and customs of the game. If they don't, there is no justification for them trying to run a tournament as a TD. I understand occasional mistakes or errors on difficult rulings, but IMO, TDs should be held to a much higher standard, ethically, than any of the players. wonton brandishings of the C word should not be acceptable when done by players, much less so by the TD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 (I counted a hand out and dropped a stiff King onside) I wonder how mad the guy would have been if you'd done that when the king was offside? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 any TD that "needs educating" should NOT be a TD. I suspect that even the best directors will admit to needing some further education. I think reporting the statement is the right thing to do...so that the director can be educated by the appropriate person. Attempting to educate the director yourself is unlikely to have good results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I suspect that even the best directors will admit to needing some further education. sure.but there are certain basics that should not have to be pointed out. eg. calling someone a cheater when they forget/fail to alert a natural 2c bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 (I counted a hand out and dropped a stiff King onside) I wonder how mad the guy would have been if you'd done that when the king was offside? LOL I meant offside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 This TD needs educating rather than reporting, people make up rules like this when they dont understand the systems that are being used and/or the rules of the game. I disagree with this. any TD that "needs educating" should NOT be a TD. with being a director comes the responsibility of knowing the laws, ethics and customs of the game. If they don't, there is no justification for them trying to run a tournament as a TD. I understand occasional mistakes or errors on difficult rulings, but IMO, TDs should be held to a much higher standard, ethically, than any of the players. wonton brandishings of the C word should not be acceptable when done by players, much less so by the TD. I assume this was a free tournament on BBO? If so there is no requirement what so ever for the person running the tournament to know anything about the laws of DCB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I assume this was a free tournament on BBO? If so there is no requirement what so ever for the person running the tournament to know anything about the laws of DCB. I understand there is no requirement, I also think that it's unethical for someone who has no clue about something like directing a bridge game to mislead others into believing that they have a competent TD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 I assume this was a free tournament on BBO? If so there is no requirement what so ever for the person running the tournament to know anything about the laws of DCB. I understand there is no requirement, I also think that it's unethical for someone who has no clue about something like directing a bridge game to mislead others into believing that they have a competent TD. Where is there evidence that this person is misleading anyone into thinking that he/she is a competent td? "automatic penalty when you open a Polish or Precision 2♣ with no alert... "is the typical type of 'rule' you'll hear in homegrown tourneys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Where is there evidence that this person is misleading anyone into thinking that he/she is a competent td? how about putting on the TD hat and parading in it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Where is there evidence that this person is misleading anyone into thinking that he/she is a competent td? how about putting on the TD hat and parading in it? Fair enough :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr1303 Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Why should a natural 2C opening have to be alerted? A 2C bid that could show any length in any suit isn't alertable, but a bid that shows length in the suit bid is? I sometimes wonder who made up these rules...? :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 Why should a natural 2C opening have to be alerted? A 2C bid that could show any length in any suit isn't alertable, but a bid that shows length in the suit bid is? I sometimes wonder who made up these rules...? :) The purpose of alerts it to let the opponents know that you're making a bid they may not understand. If most players in a community use 2♣ as an artificial strong bid, any other meaning should be alerted in that community. It doesn't matter that the other meaning is natural, it's still highly unexpected. There are some jurisdictions where the alerting rule is simply to alert all artificial bids. But many areas, such as ACBL territory, base their alerting rules on the common systems, as this fits in better with the purpose of alerting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 Why should a natural 2C opening have to be alerted? A 2C bid that could show any length in any suit isn't alertable, but a bid that shows length in the suit bid is? I sometimes wonder who made up these rules...? :) I agree with this. If you are going tio have to alert a natural 2c opening, then you should alert ALL 2c openings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.