kgr Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 [hv=d=n&s=skqjt9xxhaxdckqxx]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv]p-(1S)-p-(2D)p-(2S)-p-(3D)p-(3NT)-DBL-(4D)All pass- - What do you think about this bidding (opps play 4 card M). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Maybe the worst bid hand I have seen in all of 2008 so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echognome Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Maybe the worst bid hand I have seen in all of 2008 so far. Which one? 3NT gets my vote over pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted June 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Maybe the worst bid hand I have seen in all of 2008 so far. How would you bid it (Note that RHO did bid 1 and 2♠)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Maybe the worst bid hand I have seen in all of 2008 so far. Which one? 3NT gets my vote over pass. Pass is way worse than 3NT, but both are very retarded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echognome Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Pass is way worse than 3NT, but both are very retarded. If I had bid 3♠ and partner had bid 4♦ and it got doubled, I'd happily pass. Pass of 4♦ doubled is horrible namely because we haven't shown our hand correctly previously! Don't get me wrong, I still think pass is horrible too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted June 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Maybe the worst bid hand I have seen in all of 2008 so far. Which one? 3NT gets my vote over pass. Pass is way worse than 3NT, but both are very retarded. You can't be blamed for 3NT. That is bid by opps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 I think we are reading the problem wrong. These are the opponents, and I doubled 3NT for penalty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted June 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 I think we are reading the problem wrong. These are the opponents, and I doubled 3NT for penalty? Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echognome Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 To be fair, the opponents bids were in parantheses. Ok, I'm alright with the bidding then. I vote Roger's initial post as worst of the month. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 To be fair, the opponents bids were in parantheses. Ok, I'm alright with the bidding then. I vote Roger's initial post as worst of the month. lol gnome :P. He had the bids in parentheses, and then asked what we thought of the opponents' bidding (at least this is what I read it as, it was actually just giving details about the opps' system). I thought it was a fair interpretation. Anyway I wouldn't double 3NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted June 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2008 LHO had long ♦'s and only 7 HCP. Therefor he did run from 3NT. 4♦ made so I had better not DBLed 3NT. [hv=n=shqjtxxdtxxxcxxxx&w=s8hkxxdajxxxxxcxx&e=sa7xxxhxxxdkqcajt&s=skqjt9xxhaxdckqxx]399|300|[/hv]On scorecard there already was twice 4♠+1 and once 5♠=.I guess opps helped there by playing ♣.(We scored 0% on this board) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 I have never seen a 3♠ call over 2♠ in this auction: (1♠) - pass (2♦)(2♠) 3♠ but I would be tempted with this hand. Fine with the auction. You can add my vote to Roger's as worst post of the month. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcD Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Could not resist balancing with 4♠ over 4♦. Bidding 3♠ over 2♠ should be natural but I would rather pass to avoid any mix up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.