Jump to content

Canny Hacket


nige1

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=w&v=b&n=sa9hj9865dt9842cq&s=skj76hk43da7cat54]133|200|Scoring: IMP

European Open Championships

England v Czech Republic

Hands rotated to make declarer South

(_P) _P (_P) 1N

(_P) 2 (_P) 2

(_P) 2N (_P) 3

(_P) 4 AP

LHO leads K 2 5 A

You lead 7 J 4 6

LHO switches to 7 8 A 3

RHO returns 2 K T 5

The Hackett twins spear-head the English fight back :( and are doing well on the Butler :) In the other room the contract was 2= but typical gutsy bidding got the brothers to a pushy game :). Unfortunately, declarer didn't exploit a subtle extra chance spotted by commentator David Burn. :lol:

[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=w&v=b&n=sa9hj9865dt9842cq&s=skj73hk43da7cat54]133|200|Scoring: IMP

European Open Championships

England v Czech Republic

Hands rotated to make declarer South

(_P) _P (_P) 1N

(_P) 2 (_P) 2

(_P) 2N (_P) 3

(_P) 4 AP

LHO leads K 2 5 A

You lead 7 J 4 6

LHO switches to 7 8 A 3

RHO returns 2 K T 5

The Hackett twins spear-head the English fight back :) and are doing well on the Butler :). In the other room the contract was 2= but typical gutsy bidding got the brothers to a pushy game :P. Unfortunately, declarer didn't exploit a subtle extra chance spotted by commentator David Burn. :P

[/hv]

Did LHO have xxx, Qxx, KQJx, Jxx?*

 

* SA, CQ->K-A, C ruff, now D ruff with RHO failing, C ruff felling the J, S finesse, SK pitching diamond, CT pitching diamond.

 

This timing loses to LHO having DKQJ and the CK and the HQ. Might he have passed that red/red? Would help to know the opponents here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did LHO have xxx, Qxx, KQJx, Jxx?

...

Would help to know the opponents here

LHO is Jacub Slemr, RHO is David Vozabal. Declarer relied on a 3-3 diamond break that failed to materialise :P

David Burn's suggestion is quite simple but rather pretty :)

It caters for LHO having 3 diamonds, for example

QTxx QTx KQJ Kxx

It also succeeds against xcurt's example hand and LHO's actual hand:

xxx QTx KQJx Kxx

Futhermore it can succeed against other LHO hands such as

xxx Tx KQJx KJxx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

xxx QTx KQJx Kxx

Declarer can succeed on an elopement against the actual hand.

 

CA, C ruff, D ruff, now if the diamonds didn't split, C ruff, 3 rounds of spades and then another black card makes dummy's last trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done XCurt :) the recommended play is

K, A, ruff, ruff.

If are 3-3 then claim. Otherwise:

ruff, A, finesse J, K, or ruff

This effects a coup en passant against LHO when he holds

xxx QTx KQJx Jxx

or his actual hand:

xxx QTx KQJx Kxx

but it also effects a pretty elopement when LHO has say

xxx Tx KQJx KJxx

In the latter case, when declarer ruffs the 3rd in hand, RHO can discard a black suit; but he must follow suit when declarer ruffs the other black suit in dummy, at trick 12!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done XCurt :) the recommended play is

Well I didn't get it the first time either. I'll take some consolation in the Hackett twin missing the same play. Well done to ENGLAND slipping in at the wire too and good luck to your lads in RR2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...