OleBerg Posted June 7, 2008 Report Share Posted June 7, 2008 I have no idea what this means, sorry. I think the point was this: Edmunte1 said "I consider strategically wrong to play this kind of double as a penality double... So i consider Hamman 100% guilty for this board." PClayton said " Compton doubled 4♠ on the auction with ♠KT9x, A, A, K while I was commentating. Hamman pulled with a 1=4=4=4 which was not successful." There seems to be some disagreement about which hand Hamman held.On the BBO VuGraph, it was Compton who doubled as South, and Hamman, as North, that pulled with 1-4-4-4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted June 7, 2008 Report Share Posted June 7, 2008 Well clearly Compton should not have doubled and taken the easy plus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted June 7, 2008 Report Share Posted June 7, 2008 This would be strength showing for me. Or convertible, whatever you like to call it. Partner will pass most often, but bid with a shapely hand. 4NT would be purely t/o. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.