irdoz Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 If it is true that the HIV epidemic was caused by a single stupid vaccine producer using chimp serum then I would change that. But I have no clue if that is true. There was a well supported hypohesis that the development of oral polio vaccine (OPV) could have played a role in the early propagation of the HIV epidemic. However, when supporting evidence was sought, it was not found. Now it is generally not thought to have played any role in the HIV epidemic. The most accepted theory is that the precursor to HIV is a virus known as SIV that occurs in monkeys. HIV closer to that seen in humans has been documented in a particular (protected) chimpanzee population that feeds on SIV-infected monkeys. There are two common strains of SIV and it is believed they recombined within chimpanzees to form a virus closer to HIV. (It is possible that colonization and destruction of habitat caused migration of the chimpanzees and exposure to monkeys with different sorts of SIV) It is likely that human hunters became infected with HIV from hunting chimpanzees. By estimating the changes in genetic patterns between the HIV found in chimpanzees and the first HIV infections in humans it is thought that HIV first crossed into humans somewhere betweeen 1915 and 1945. The first confirmed cases (from stored samples) were in West Africa in the late 1950s, USA in a teenager in the late 1960s and in Norway in the mid-70s. Recently another retrovirus (SFV or simian foamy virus) has been shown to have spread from non-human primates to human hunters. (SFV doesnt cause serious illness in humans). This confirms that cross species transmission of retroviruses occurs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zasanya Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 Changing just one event will not change the course of History.Yet I wish the atom Bomb had not been dropped on Hiroshima. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 Changing just one event will not change the course of History.Yet I wish the atom Bomb had not been dropped on Hiroshima. Have you considered the alternative? I assure you, Harry Truman did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 Surely there is some future event that would be better avoided. I'd like to travel 50 years into the future, look back on those 50 years and then pick an event in that time frame to change. I think it was Douglas Adams who wrote that while the technical problems can probably be solved, it will be a major headache to find the propper verb tense to use while refering to an event that happened/happens before you travelled back from the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y66 Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 According immortal, artificial, unfeeling entities (corporations) with the rights of persons is a huge historical mistake. Maybe it's not too late to undo this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.